Skip to main content
. 2023 Jun 8;12(7):e220402. doi: 10.1530/EC-22-0402

Table 1.

Baseline and longitudinal features of the total population.

T0 T1 T2 T3 T4 T5 Χ2 p
Number of patients 117 99 90 72 58 46 n.a. n.a.
Prepubertal (%) 87/117 (74%) 59/99 (60%) 45/90 (50%) 23/72 (32%) 14/58 (24%) 0/46 (0%) 51.57 <0.05a
Male (%) 61/117 (52%) 51/99 (51%) 45/90 (50%) 39/72 (54%) 30/58 (52%) 19/46 (41%) 1.12 0.95
CA (years) 8.67 ± 3.33 9.68 ± 3.38 10.49 ± 3.33 11.25 ± 3.34 11.92 ± 3.06 15.64 ± 1.49 164.04 <0.05a
BA (years) 7.94 ± 3.15 9.06 ± 3.25 9.85 ± 3.58 10.81 ± 3.98 12.44 ± 3.21 14.97 ± 1.36 23.09 0.00012a
BA delay (years) –1.07 ± 1.09 –0.89 ± 1.10 –0.77 ± 1.01 –0.67 ± 1.33 –0.32 ± 1.19 n.a. 5.82 0.21
H SDS –2.37 ± 0.67 –1.91 ± 0.64 –1.64 ± 0.73 –1.45 ± 0.62 –1.39 ± 0.64 –1.65 ± 0.94 107.14 <0.05a
BMI SDS –0.07 ± 0.94 –0.09 ± 0.97 –0.05 ± 1.01 –0.13 ± 0.92 –0.02 ± 0.84 0.28 ± 1.04 13.19 0.02
GV SDS –1.37 ± 1.65 1.85 ± 2.08 1.32 ± 2.23 0.99 ± 2.02 0.36 ± 2.19 –0.99 ± 2.21 18.27 0.002a
Arm span/H ratio 0.97 ± 0.07 0.98 ± 0.13 0.97 ± 0.03 0.97 ± 0.03 0.97 ± 0.04 0.97 ± 0.02 2.13 0.83
Sitting H/H ratio 0.56 ± 0.02 0.56 ± 0.05 0.55 ± 0.02 0.55 ± 0.01 0.55 ± 0.02 0.56 ± 0.02 19.36 0.0016a
Sitting H/H ratio SDS 2.19 ± 1.27 2.12 ± 1.35 2.10 ± 1.31 2.10 ± 1.28 2.11 ± 1.37 2.24 ± 1.12 9.74 0.08
Rappold’s score 7.51 ± 4.86 7.72 ± 5.10 7.14 ± 5.67 7.08 ± 5.41 6.35 ± 5.36 7.57 ± 5.66 1.24 0.94
Tibial varus (%) 35/101 (34%) 38/69 (55%) 32/79 (40%) 28/65 (43%) 24/50 (48%) 22/42 (52%) 9.12 0.34
Muscular pseudohypertrophy (%) 45/100 (45%) 42/71 (59%) 36/80 (45%) 28/65 (43%) 21/50 (42%) 2/4 (50%) 7.3 0.56
High-arched palate (%) 15/89 (17%) 12/73 (16%) 12/67 (18%) 10/53 (19%) 8/38 (21%) 1/4 (25%) 4.5 0.67
rhGH dose (mg/kg/week) 0.23 ± 0.04 0.24 ± 0.05 0.24 ± 0.06 0.24 ± 0.06 0.24 ± 0.06 n.a. 4.97 0.28
IGF1 SDS –0.99 ± 0.93 0.69 ± 1.30 0.87 ± 1.20 0.95 ± 1.42 1.16 ± 1.17 n.a. 48.56 <0.05a

aP < 0.05 from longitudinal analysis (T0 –T5) using Friedman ANOVA test. Bold values represent statistical significance.