Table 4.
T2 T1 |
% Time spent in interactions (sensors) | Number of different partners (sensors) | Closeness centrality (sensors) | No. received nominations (PN) | Closeness centrality (PN) | Sense of lonelinessa | During-lockdown contact |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
% Time spent in interactions (sensors) | −0.414* | −0.113 | −0.301 | 0.007 | 0.035 | −0.106 | −0.063 |
Number of different partners (sensors) | .-441* | −0.242 | −0.426* | −0.242 | −0.162 | −0.191 | −0.169 |
Closeness centrality (sensors) | −0.347 | −0.172 | −0.302 | −0.126 | −0.187 | 0.034 | −0.021 |
No. received nominations (PN) | 0.199 | 0.387* | 0.287 | 0.550** | 0.371* | 0.269 | 0.034 |
Closeness centrality (PN) | 0.142 | 0.373 | 0.235 | 0.049 | 0.449* | 0.239 | 0.128 |
Sense of lonelinessa | −0.152 | 0.027 | −0.300 | 0.249 | 0.263 | 0.634** | 0.292 |
During-lockdown contact | 0.103 | 0.153 | 0.125 | 0.188 | 0.351* | 0.426* |
N = 43. *p (two-tailed) < 0.05; **p < .01.
Higher score = less loneliness.