Skip to main content
. 2023 Jun 27;8(4):e1083. doi: 10.1097/PR9.0000000000001083

Table 2.

Models with pain catastrophizing as outcome: summary and model comparison.

Model name Linear regression outcome Likelihood ratio test Effect of predictors VIF
R 2 F P Log likelihood P Predictor β P
Set of nested models 1 (without anxiety and depression) MPC1 0.05 7.22 0.008 −443.90 Age −0.22 0.008
MPC2 0.14 10.85 <0.001 −437.29 <0.001 Age −0.26 0.001 1.01
Childhood trauma 0.20 <0.001 1.01
MPC3 0.15 7.76 <0.001 −436.52 0.21 Age −0.27 <0.001 1.02
Childhood trauma 0.18 0.001 1.07
Impact of trauma history 0.09 0.22 1.05
Set of nested models 2 (with anxiety and depression) MPC4 0.38 23.97 <0.001 −418.83 Age −0.11 0.10 1.15
Depression 1.29 <0.001 1.45
Anxiety 0.77 0.004 1.63
MPC5 0.40 20.21 <0.001 −415.89 0.01 Age −0.14 0.04 1.19
Depression 1.17 <0.001 1.49
Anxiety 0.71 0.007 1.64
Childhood trauma 0.11 0.01 1.09
MPC6 0.40 16.05 <0.001 −415.85 0.77 Age −0.15 0.03 1.21
Depression 1.17 <0.001 1.49
Anxiety 0.70 0.009 1.70
Childhood trauma 0.11 0.02 1.13
Impact of trauma history 0.01 0.78 1.10

MPC, outcome pain catastrophizing; MPC1, predictor: age; MPC2, predictors: age and childhood trauma; MPC3, predictors: age, childhood trauma, and impact of trauma history; MPC4, predictors: age and anxiety depression; MPC5, predictors: age, anxiety depression, and childhood trauma; MPC6, predictors: age, anxiety depression, childhood trauma, and impact of trauma history; VIF, variance inflation factor.