Skip to main content
. 2023 May 22;25(7):711–724. doi: 10.1007/s11886-023-01894-7

Table 1.

Summary of the main characteristics and findings of the included articles (n = 13)

Authors (years) Participants
(M/F, mean age)
Alexithymia Measures Other Measures Main results of alexithymia in HTN participants Risk bias
Casagrande et al. (2019b) [18••]

810 with HTN (434 F; mean age: 60.1, SD: 11.2)

431 without HTN (273 F; mean age: 51.5, SD: 10.2)

TAS-20

Socio-demographic and clinical data: age, gender, marital status, years of education, smoking, alcohol consumption, BMI, SBP, DBP, mean arterial pressure, heart rate, and clinical information

Adherence to drug: ad hoc yes/no questionnaire

Alexithymia prevalence in HTN participants: 16.4% (133). Alexithymia mean (SD) score in HTN participants: 49.01 (12.10)

HTN participants reported higher levels of alexithymia compared to individuals without HTN (normotensive individuals), even after controlling for age, education, and BMI

In addition, treated HTN reported higher alexithymia scores compared to both untreated participants with and without HTN

Low
Consoli et al. (2010) [19]

98 with HTN: 73 with essential HTN, 25 with secondary HTN

(62 F, mean age essential HTN: 53.4, SD essential HTN: 12.7; mean age secondary HTN: 52.2, SD secondary HTN: 15.7)

TAS-20

Socio-demographic and clinical data: age, gender, education, disease duration, smoking, BMI, SBP, DBP, and clinical information

Emotion awareness: LEAS

Coping: WCC

Alexithymia prevalence in essential HTN vs. secondary HTN patients: 25% (18) vs. 20% (5)

Alexithymia mean (SD) score in essential HTN vs. secondary HTN patients: 54.2 (11.6) vs. 48.4 (12.1)

No statistically significant differences between essential HTN and secondary HTN patients either in alexithymia scores or in alexithymia percentages

Low
Di Trani et al. (2018) [30]

15 with HTN (8 F; mean age: 48.5, SD: 10.7)

20 without HTN (13 F; mean age: 25, SD: 3.8)

TAS-20

TSIA

Socio-demographic data: age and gender

Linguistic measures: WRAD, Italian reflection dictionary, disfluency dictionary, and somatic sense

Alexithymia mean (SD) score in HTN participants: TAS: 40.23 (9.92); TSIA: 28.20 (6.03)

HTN participants did not report higher levels of alexithymia on the TAS-20 compared to individuals without HTN, whereas they yielded higher scores on the TSIA than individuals without HTN

High
Gage and Egan (1984) [36]

66 with HTN (34 F; mean age and SD: N.A.)

No control group

MMPI Socio-demographic data: age, gender, DBP ≥ 95 mm Hg

Alexithymia prevalence in HTN participants: 47% (31)

In alexithymic HTN participants the severity of HTN was greater than in non-alexithymic HTN participants

High
Grabe et al. (2010) [39]

503 with HTN (247 F; mean age: 51.0, SD: 0.4)

675 without HTN (417 F; mean age: 42.7, SD: 0.4)

TAS-20

Socio-demographic and clinical data: age, gender, education, marital status, smoking, physical activity, BMI, SBP, DBP, and clinical information

Mental distress: CID-S

Alexithymia prevalence in HTN participants: 23.9% (120)

Alexithymia mean (SD) score in HTN participants: 42.6 (0.4)

HTN participants yielded higher alexithymia scores and were found to be more alexithymic (score ≥ 49) compared to individuals without HTN

Low
Hänninen et al. (2011) [33]

744 with HTN: 221 with white-coat HTN, 118 with masked HTN, 405 with sustained HTN

(white-coat HTN: 107 F; mean age: 56.2, SD: 8.1; masked HTN: 44 F; mean age: 56.9, SD 8.1; sustained HTN: 187 F; mean age: 58.6, SD: 8.5)

715 without HTN (426 F; mean age: 53.9, SD: 7.2)

TAS-20

Socio-demographic and clinical data: age, gender, education, marital status, smoking, physical activity, alcohol consumption, BMI, office SBP and DBP, home SBP and DBP, and clinical information

Psychopathological symptoms: Whiteley-7, BDI, GHQ-12

Patients with sustained HTN reported higher alexithymia scores compared to patients with white-coat HTN Low
Jula et al. (1999) [34]

237 with HTN

(99 F; mean age: 45.7 for M, 46.4 for F; SD: 5.1 for M, 4.7 for F)

146 without HTN

(78 F; mean age: 44 for M, 44.2 for F; SD: 5.3 for M, 5.4 for F)

TAS-26

Socio-demographic and clinical data: age, gender, socioeconomic class, BMI, alcohol intake, smoking, SBP, DBP, clinical information

Psychopathological symptom: BSI-37, STAXI

Alexithymia prevalence in HTN participants: 57% (79) men; 46% (46) women

Alexithymia mean (SD) score in HTN participants: 45.7 (5.1) men; 46.4 (4.7) women

HTN participants have significantly higher TAS mean scores and a higher prevalence of alexithymia than individuals without HTN. HTN women had more somatization symptoms than women HC

Low
Muneta et al. (1997) [38] 101 with HTN: 48 whit white-coat HTN, 53 with sustained HTN (white-coat HTN: 34 F, mean age: 59.2, SD: 9.5; 14 M, mean age: 60.1, SD: 11.5; sustained HTN: 32 F, mean age: 58.6, SD: 9.7; 21 M, mean age: 59.5, SD: 13) MMPI

Socio-demographic and clinical data: age, gender, clinic SBP and DBP, home SBP and DBP

Psychological characteristics and symptoms: SRQ-D, Type A Behavior Pattern Questionnaire, GHQ, ECL

Alexithymia prevalence: in white-coat HTN participants, 14.3% (2) men; 26.5% (9) women; in sustained HTN participants, 4.8% (1) men, 31.3% (10) women

Alexithymia mean (SD) score: in white-coat HTN participants, 12.9 (4.6) men; 15.2 (1.9) women; in sustained HTN participants, 13.7 (1.8) men, 15.8 (2.3) women

White-coat HTN participants did not differ from sustained HTN in alexithymia scores

Medium
Niiranen et al. (2006) [35]

593 with HTN: 371 with sustained HTN, 222 with isolated clinical HTN (sustained HTN: 169 F, mean age: 57.9, SD: 8.6; isolated clinical HTN: 108 F, mean age: 55.8, SD: 8.3)

847 without HTN (370 F; mean age: 53.5, SD: 7.6)

TAS-20

Socio-demographic and clinical data: age, gender, education, smoking, BMI, clinic blood pressure (SBP, DBP), clinical information

Psychopathological symptoms: Whiteley-7, BDI, GHQ-12

Alexithymia mean (SD) score: in sustained HTN participants, 48.2 (10.9); in isolated clinical HTN participants, 45.2 (10.8)

Sustained HTN participants had higher scores of alexithymia and were more alexithymic than those with isolated clinical HTN and without HTN

Low
Paulson (1985) [37]

53 with HTN (4 F; mean age: 56.5, SD: 6.5)

No control group

BIQ

MMPI Schalling-Sifneos Scale

Socio-demographic and clinical data: age, gender, marital status, education, clinical information

Alexithymia prevalence in HTN participants: 41% (22) (BIQ)

No differences were found between alexithymic and non-alexithymic participants for socio-demographic and clinical data. No correlation was found between BIQ and other scales used

Medium
Piotrowska-Półrolnik et al. (2019) [20••]

39 with HTN (23 F, mean age: 42.9, SD: 13.5)

37 without HTN (26 F, mean age: 36.7, SD: 11.5)

TAS-20 Socio-demographic and clinical data: age, gender, education, marital status, BMI, clinical information, 24 h-ABPM

Alexithymia prevalence in HTN participants: 17.9% (7). Alexithymia mean (SD) score in HTN participants: 48.33 (N.A.)

Alexithymia mean level was higher in HTN participants than in individuals without HTN. There were statistically significant positive correlations between higher alexithymia levels and higher 24-h SBP values

Medium
Rafanelli et al. (2012) [31]

125 with HTN (52 F, mean age: 66.4, SD: 11)

No control group

DCPR

Socio-demographic and clinical data: age, gender, education, marital status, working status, clinical information, smoking, family risk, blood pressure ranging

Psychological characteristics and symptoms: SCID, PSI, SQ, PWB scale

Alexithymia prevalence in HTN participants: 36% (45). The alexithymia cluster consisted of 55 patients (68.7%). HTN participants with moderate to severe levels of HTN have been more represented in the anxiety-depression and alexithymia clusters Low
Todarello et al. (1995) [32]

114 with HTN (64 F, mean age: 52.5, SD: 11)

113 Psychiatric patients

130 without HTN (81 F, mean age: 40.8, SD: 16.7)

TAS-20 Socio-demographic and clinical data: age, gender, education, clinical information, SBP, DBP

Alexithymia prevalence in HTN participants: 55.3% (63). Alexithymia mean (SD) score in HTN participants: 61.99 (13.93)

HTN participants had significantly higher levels of alexithymia than psychiatric patients, which had higher scores than individuals without HTN. A significantly higher rate of alexithymia was found in the HTN group than other two groups

Medium

HTN Hypertension, TAS Toronto Alexithymia Scale, BMI Body Mass Index, LEAS Levels of Emotional Awareness Scale, WCC Ways of Coping Checklist, TSIA Toronto Structured Interview for Alexithymia, WRAD Weighted Referential Activity Dictionary, NA Not Available, MMPI Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory, CID-S Composite International Diagnostic-Screener, BDI Beck Depression Inventory, GHQ General Health Questionnaire, SBP Systolic Blood Pressure, DBP Diastolic Blood Pressure, BSI-37 Brief Symptoms Inventory, STAXI 31 item Spielberger State-Trait Anger Expression Inventory, SRQ-D Self Rating Questionnaire for Depression, ECL Egogram Check List, BIQ Beth Israel Hospital Questionnaire, ABPM Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring, DCPR Diagnostic Criteria for Psychosomatic Research, SCID Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV, PSI Psychosocial Index, SQ Symptom Questionnaire, PWB Psychological Well-Being Scale