Skip to main content
. 2023 Jun 14;8(25):23130–23141. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.3c02548

Table 3. Optimization of Reaction Conditions for Reduction of Compound 4 by 3α-HSDHa.

graphic file with name ao3c02548_0012.jpg

entry solvent 3α-HSDb(400 g/L) GDHb (400 g/L) gluconate/H2O NAD+ (g) yield (%)b conversionc
1 t-butanol (25 mL) 5 mL 5 mL 5 g/15 mL 0.025 89 100% (1 h)
2 Isopropanol (25 mL) 5 mL 5 mL 5 g/15 mL 0.025 65 80% (1 h)
3 Ethyl acetate (25 mL) 5 mL 5 mL 5 g/15 mL 0.025 / 20% (1 h)
4 t-butanol (25 mL) 4 mL 4 mL 5 g/15 mL 0.025 92 100% (1.5 h)
5 t-butanol (25 mL) 3 mL 3 mL 5 g/15 mL 0.025 93 100% (1 h)
6 t-butanol (30 mL) 3 mL 3 mL 5 g/15 mL 0.025 80 90% (1 h)
7 t-butanol (35 mL) 3 mL 3 mL 5 g/15 mL 0.025 92 100% (1 h)
8 t-butanol (35 mL) 3 mL 3 mL 4.5 g/15 mL 0.015 93 100% (1 h)
9 t-butanol (35 mL) 3 mL 3 mL 4.0 g/15 mL 0.015 95 100% (1 h)
10d t-butanol (350 mL) 30 mL 30 mL 45g/150 mL 0.15 95 100% (1.5 h)
a

Charged with compound 4 (5 g); the pH (6.8–7.2) was adjusted with sodium hydroxide solution (1 mol/L), 30 °C.

b

The concentration of cells was about 400 g/L.

c

Determined by HPLC.

d

Charged with compound 4 (50 g).