Skip to main content
. 2023 Jun 29;24:196. doi: 10.1186/s12882-023-03248-5

Table 2.

Characteristics of patients and dialysis parameters in the training and test data

All (n = 314) Train data (n = 237) Test data (n = 77)
Demographics
Age, years 66.4 ± 12.4 66.4 ± 12.5 66.3 ± 12.3
Gender (Male/Female) 224 /90 170 /67 54 /23
Race, n (%)
Asian (Japanese) 312 (99.4) 235 (99.2) 77 (100.0)
Asian (Southeast Asian) 2 (0.6) 2 (0.8) 0 (0.0)
Dialysis vintage, years 4.0 (2.0–8.0) 4.0 (2.0-8.8) 4.0 (2.0–6.0)
Body mass index, kg/m2 22.2 ± 4.3 22.1 ± 3.8 22.6 ± 5.4
Primary disease, n (%)
Diabetic nephropathy 133 (42.4) 95 (40.1) 38 (49.4)
Chronic glomerulonephritis 61 (19.4) 51 (21.5) 10 (13.0)
Nephrosclerosis 52 (16.6) 40 (16.9) 12 (15.6)
Polycystic kidney disease 12 (3.8) 11 (4.6) 1 (1.3)
Others 56 (17.8) 40 (16.9) 16 (20.8)
Dialysis parameter
UF (L/session) 2.4 ± 0.97 2.4 ± 0.95 2.6 ± 1.03
UFR (L/hr) 0.61 ± 0.24 0.60 ± 0.24 0.64 ± 0.25
Dry Weight (kg) 59.7 ± 14.2 59.3 ± 12.8 60.8 ± 17.6
Dialysis mode, n (%)
HD 5047 (7.3) 3238 (6.2) 1809 (10.4)
HD + ECUM 306 (0.4) 146 (0.3) 160 (0.9)
OHDF 63,700 (91.8) 48,320 (93.0) 15,380 (88.2)
OHDF + ECUM 254 (0.4) 185 (0.4) 69 (0.4)
ECUM 68 (0.1) 46 (0.1) 22 (0.1)

Values are expressed as mean ± standard deviation, median (interquartile range), or percent frequency

UF, ultrafiltration; UFR, ultrafiltration rate; HD, hemodialysis; ECUM, extracorporeal ultrafiltration method; OHDF, online hemodiafiltration