Table 5.
Association between arousal index, nocturnal hypoxemia and carotid atherosclerosis
| Arousal Index* Beta (SD) | P-value | % time spent in SaO2* < 90% Beta (SD) | p-value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||
| Vascular inflammation (Avg. TBRmean) | ||||
| Model 1 | 0.0336 (0.0428) | 0.43 | −0.0009 (0.0184) | 0.96 |
| Model 2 | 0.0121 (0.0432) | 0.78 | −0.0065 (0.0178) | 0.72 |
| Model 3 | 0.0414 (0.0432) | 0.34 | −0.0012 (0.0214) | 0.95 |
| Vascular inflammation (Avg. TBRmax) | ||||
| Model 1 | 0.0200 (0.0530) | 0.71 | 0.0040 (0.0230) | 0.86 |
| Model 2 | 0.0049 (0.0525) | 0.93 | −0.0062 (0.0219) | 0.78 |
| Model 3 | 0.0377 (0.0523) | 0.47 | −0.0018 (0.0258) | 0.94 |
| Avg. Carotid wall thickness | ||||
| Model 1 | 0.0090 (0.0353) | 0.80 | 0.0239 (0.0135) | 0.08 |
| Model 2 | 0.0117 (0.0336) | 0.73 | 0.0163 (0.0125) | 0.19 |
| Model 3 | 0.0280 (0.0343) | 0.41 | 0.0266 (0.0152) | 0.08 |
Model 1: Unadjusted
Model 2: Adjusted for age, sex, race/ethnicity
Model 3: Adjusted for Model 2 + BMI, smoking, hypertension, dyslipidemia
TBR target-to-background ratio, SaO2 oxygen saturation, SD standard deviation
Continuous Arousal index and percent time spent in SaO2 < 90% was log transformed due to skewness