Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Jun 29.
Published in final edited form as: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2022 Oct 31;39(3):621–630. doi: 10.1007/s10554-022-02743-4

Table 5.

Association between arousal index, nocturnal hypoxemia and carotid atherosclerosis

Arousal Index* Beta (SD) P-value % time spent in SaO2* < 90% Beta (SD) p-value

Vascular inflammation (Avg. TBRmean)
 Model 1 0.0336 (0.0428) 0.43 −0.0009 (0.0184) 0.96
 Model 2 0.0121 (0.0432) 0.78 −0.0065 (0.0178) 0.72
 Model 3 0.0414 (0.0432) 0.34 −0.0012 (0.0214) 0.95
Vascular inflammation (Avg. TBRmax)
 Model 1 0.0200 (0.0530) 0.71 0.0040 (0.0230) 0.86
 Model 2 0.0049 (0.0525) 0.93 −0.0062 (0.0219) 0.78
 Model 3 0.0377 (0.0523) 0.47 −0.0018 (0.0258) 0.94
Avg. Carotid wall thickness
 Model 1 0.0090 (0.0353) 0.80 0.0239 (0.0135) 0.08
 Model 2 0.0117 (0.0336) 0.73 0.0163 (0.0125) 0.19
 Model 3 0.0280 (0.0343) 0.41 0.0266 (0.0152) 0.08

Model 1: Unadjusted

Model 2: Adjusted for age, sex, race/ethnicity

Model 3: Adjusted for Model 2 + BMI, smoking, hypertension, dyslipidemia

TBR target-to-background ratio, SaO2 oxygen saturation, SD standard deviation

*

Continuous Arousal index and percent time spent in SaO2 < 90% was log transformed due to skewness