Skip to main content
. 2023 Jun 15;15:1181160. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2023.1181160

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Network meta-analysis Comparisons for MoCA. Interventions are reported in alphabetical order. Data are MDs (95% CI) of the column-defining intervention compared to the row-defining intervention. For MoCA, 95% CI doesn't contain 0 and MDs higher than 0 favor the column-defining treatment (i.e., the first in alphabetical order). Significant results are in bold and underscored. Manual acupuncture plus herbal decoction (MDs ranging between 2.87 and 6.04), electroacupuncture (MDs ranging between 2.08 and 4.27) and manual acupuncture plus piracetam (MDs ranging between 1.66 and 3.60) are more effective than other interventions. Nimodipine (MDs ranging between −1.74 and −5.87) and donepezil hydrochloride (MDs ranging between −1.26 and −6.04) are among the least efficacious interventions. MD, mean difference; CI, confidence interval. Intervention: A: manual acupuncture; B: electroacupuncture; C: nimodipine; D: donepezil hydrochloride; E: piracetam; F: herbal decoction; G: manual acupuncture plus electroacupuncture; H: manual acupuncture plus nimodipine; I: manual acupuncture plus donepezil hydrochloride; J: manual acupuncture plus piracetam; K: manual acupuncture plus herbal decoction; L: electroacupuncture plus nimodipine; M: warm acupuncture plus nimodipine; N: manual acupuncture plus electroacupuncture plus nimodipine.