Skip to main content
. 2023 Jun 2;7(7):100107. doi: 10.1016/j.cdnut.2023.100107

TABLE 5.

Probability of medium or high consumption by healthy GDQS food group and gender in farming households: LPM estimates

Food group Men
Women
Predicted probability of medium or high consumption (%) 95% CI Predicted probability of medium. or high consumption (%) 95% CI
Citrus fruits 1.57 1.10 2.04 1.81 1.35 2.27
Deep orange fruits 0.17 <0.01 0.44 0.33 0.04 0.62
Other fruits 6.76 5.91 7.60 7.04 6.24 7.84
Dark green leafy vegetables 35.18 33.57 36.79 34.97 33.43 36.52
Cruciferous vegetables 36.78 35.12 38.43 36.03 34.44 37.62
Deep orange vegetables 2.30 1.73 2.87 2.20 1.66 2.74
Other vegetables 94.62 93.90 95.34 93.70 92.96 94.45
Legumes 26.67 25.17 28.17 25.61 24.16 27.07
Deep orange tubers 0.01 <0.01 0.25 0.05 <0.01 0.29
Nuts and seeds 0.61 0.26 0.96 0.70 0.35 1.04
Whole grains 27.53 25.95 29.12 25.42 23.94 26.91
Liquid oils 99.39 99.09 99.69 99.20 98.89 99.52
Fish and shellfish 76.39 75.00 77.77 75.78 74.42 77.14
Poultry and game meat 11.84 10.71 12.97 11.75 10.64 12.86
Low-fat dairy 0.02 <0.01 0.27 0.02 <0.01 0.25
Eggs 16.65 15.44 17.85 15.28 14.13 16.42
High-fat dairy 12.66 11.58 13.74 11.30 10.33 12.27
Red meat 5.49 4.70 6.29 4.92 4.18 5.66

This model contained an interaction effect between food group and gender and adjusted for age (years, log transformed) and household fixed effects. Standard errors are clustered at the household level. Predicted probabilities and confidence intervals (CIs) are displayed for ease of interpretation. Full interaction model results are available on request.

Abbreviations: CAR, caloric adequacy ratio; DDS, dietary diversity score; GDQS, global diet quality score.