Skip to main content
. 2023 Jun 29;408(1):255. doi: 10.1007/s00423-023-02974-6

Table 5.

Comparison of histopathology and outcome between benign insulinomas of group 1 (2000–2010) and group 2 (2011–2020)

Variables MIC group 1
(n = 7)
MIC group 2
(n = 11)
P value Open group 1
(n = 29)
Open group 2
(n = 10)
P value
Tumor size in mmc 15 (11–22) 15 (11–23) 0.492a 14 (5–32) 13 (7–30) 0.935a
Resection status*
 R0 3/4 (75%) 10 (91.%) 0.476b 15/18 (83%) 6/8 (75%) 0.628b
 R1 1/4 (25%) 1 (9%) 3/18 (17%) 2/8 (25%)
Ki67 index*
 G1 7 (100%) 9 (82%) 0.497b 17/23 (74%) 8 (80%) 1.000b
 G2 0 2 (18%) 6/23 (26%) 2 (20%)
Positive IHC for insulin* 7 (100%) 11 (100%) 27/27 (100%) 10 (100%)
Number of resected lymph nodesc 0 (0–1) 0 (0–5) 0.804a 1 (0–20) 3 (0–13) 0.173a
Median follow-upc 140 (48–192) 52 (13–89) 190 (3–249) 50.5 (1–110)
Disease status at evaluation point*
 NED 6 (86%) 11 (100%) 0.389b 21/24 (87%) 10 (100%) 0.539b
 DURC 1 (14%) 0 3/24 (13%) 0

aMann-Whitney U test

bFisher’s exact test

cMedian with range (months)

IHC immunohistochemistry, NED no evidence of disease, DURC dead of unrelated causes

*Missing data