Table 1.
Author (first) of study | Study design | Type of switch | Drug switched | Number of patients | Population type | Main findingsa | Adverse events |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ting et al. [47] | Randomized, double-blind, multiple-dose, steady-state, fully replicated bioequivalence study | Repeated switching every 2 weeks | Generic lamotrigine and brand-name lamotrigine | 34 | “Generic-brittle” patients already taking lamotrigine | Bioequivalence of generic lamotrigine to brand-name lamotrigine | Adverse events on generic unrelated to the small, allowable pharmacokinetic differences between generic and brand-name |
Privitera et al. [48] | Randomized, double-blind, crossover study | Repeated switching every 14 days, for 2 months | Generic to generic lamotrigine | 33 | Adults (aged ≥ 18 years) with epilepsy from six epilepsy centers receiving immediate-release lamotrigine | Bioequivalence of generic lamotrigine products (high and low) in patients with epilepsy |
No significant change in adverse events No study-related serious adverse events |
Berg et al. [49] | Crossover, prospective, sequence-randomized, replicate pharmacokinetic study | Subtherapeutic single-dose switching after washout period | Two generic lamotrigine formulations and brand-name lamotrigine | 50 | Adults (≥ 18 years) with epilepsy on concomitant ASM and not currently receiving lamotrigine | Bioequivalence of generic lamotrigine-high and generic lamotrigine-low to brand-name lamotrigine |
Most adverse events were mild and unrelated to treatment Adverse events not related to a particular product |
Vari et al. [40] | Prospective study | Switch from brand-name to generic ASM | Brand-name levetiracetam to generic levetiracetam | 59 | Patients with primary, cryptogenic or symptomatic epilepsy | No increase of seizures and adverse effects after switching from brand-name to generic levetiracetam |
3.4% switchback rate Increased adverse effects on generic levetiracetam in 2 (3.4%) Increased seizure on generic levetiracetam in 2 (3.4%) |
Markoula et al. [42] | Prospective, open-label, non-randomized, steady-state, multiple-dose, bioequivalence study | One switch after 4 weeks | Brand-name levetiracetam to generic levetiracetam | 12 | Patients with epilepsy receiving brand-name levetiracetam | bioequivalence of generic levetiracetam to brand-name levetiracetam | No significant change in adverse events |
Bosak et al. [38] | Retrospective study | (mostly forced) switch to generic ASM | Brand-name levetiracetam to generic levetiracetam | 151 | Patients with epilepsy receiving levetiracetam | Switching from brand-name to generic levetiracetam is generally safe |
Nine patients (6%) had increased frequency of seizures Six patients (4%) had adverse events |
Reimers et al. [43] | Naturalistic, open, prospective, two-center study | Overnight switch to generic ASM | Brand-name levetiracetam to generic levetiracetam | 33 | Patients with epilepsy receiving levetiracetam | Equal fluctuation of levetiracetam serum concentrations with brand-name and generic levetiracetam | N/A |
Fanella et al. [44] | Observational study | Switch to generic ASM | Brand-name levetiracetam to generic levetiracetam | 36 | Seizure-free patients with epilepsy receiving levetiracetam | Slight, non-statistically significant variability in levetiracetam serum concentration was documented after the switch |
8% switchback rate 3 patients dropped out due to adverse events |
Gha-hyun and Dae [37] | Prospective study | Switch from brand-name to generic ASM | Brand-name levetiracetam to generic levetiracetam | 148 | Patients with epilepsy who were treated with brand-name levetiracetam for at least 6 months of sustained use |
Minimal risk of increased seizure frequency after generic substitution Increased seizure frequency was noted in seven patients (4.7%), and a decreased seizure frequency was noted in 10 (6.8%) |
No significant change in adverse events |
Trimboli et al. [41] | Prospective observational real-life study | Switch from brand-name to generic ASM | Brand-name levetiracetam to generic levetiracetam | 125 | Patients with epilepsy who were treated with brand-name levetiracetam mono- or polytherapy for at least 6 months of sustained use | brand-name-to-generic levetiracetam switching was effective and safe in both monotherapy and polytherapy regardless of the epilepsy syndrome | 24% of patients treated with generic monotherapy reported adverse effects, some leading to treatment discontinuation |
Tharavichitkun et al. [50] | Retrospective study | Switch from brand-name to generic ASM for 6 months, then switch back | Brand-name levetiracetam to generic levetiracetam | 75 | Patients with stable seizure frequency | Generic levetiracetam might not show therapeutic equivalence to the original molecule, especially in patients adequately controlled by the brand-name drug | 8% experienced adverse events after brand-name to generic substitution |
Liang et al. [39] | Retrospective study | Switch from brand-name to domestic generic ASM | Brand-name levetiracetam to generic levetiracetam | 154 | Children with epilepsy | Switching from brand-name to generic levetiracetam is safe and effective | 3 children (1.9%) experienced mild adverse drug reactions |
Lang et al. [51] | Retrospective study, database analysis | Switch by the manufacturer of the same ASM at the last prescription before the index date | Any | 678 | Children and adolescents (< 18 years) with epilepsy and at least 2 prescriptions within 360 days and 1 within 180 days prior to the index date | Manufacturer switch of generic or brand-name ASM does not increase the risk for seizure recurrence in previously seizure-free children and adolescents with epilepsy | N/A |
Lang et al. [52] | Retrospective study, database analysis | Switch by the manufacturer of the same ASM at the last prescription before the index date | Any | 3530 | Patients with epilepsy and at least 2 prescriptions within 360 days and 1 within 180 days prior to the index date | Manufacturer switch of ASM increases the risk for seizure recurrence in previously seizure-free patients | N/A |
Kesselheim et al. 2016 [59] | Population-based case-crossover study | Refill of the same ASM from the same manufacturer or a different manufacturer | Any | 83,001 | Generic ASM users who experienced a seizure-related hospital admission or emergency room | Switch to a different generic manufacturer not associated with increased risk | Use of generic ASM associated with 8% increase in odds of seizure-related events |
Hansen et al. 2013 [53] | Retrospective case–control study | Switch between bioequivalent ASM (brand-name to generic, generic to brand-name, generic to generic) | Any | 1053 | Patients with epilepsy with a claim for an ambulance encounter, emergency department (ED) visit, or inpatient hospitalization | Modest association between ASM switching and seizure-related events | N/A |
Polard et al. 2015 [60] | Case crossover study | Brand-name to generic substitution | Any | 8379 | Adult patients with epilepsy | No association between brand-name-to-generic ASM substitution and risk of seizure-related hospitalization | N/A |
Studies in table are organized chronologically by the type of drug switched
ASM Antiseizure medication, N/A not available
aItalics indicates positive outcome (bioequivalence of ASM switch); bold-italics indicates negative outcome (no bioequivalence)