Skip to main content
editorial
. 2023 May 24;12(4):1015–1031. doi: 10.1007/s40120-023-00491-8

Table 1.

Studies on anti-seizure medication switching in the past 10 years

Author (first) of study Study design Type of switch Drug switched Number of patients Population type Main findingsa Adverse events
Ting et al. [47] Randomized, double-blind, multiple-dose, steady-state, fully replicated bioequivalence study Repeated switching every 2 weeks Generic lamotrigine and brand-name lamotrigine 34 “Generic-brittle” patients already taking lamotrigine Bioequivalence of generic lamotrigine to brand-name lamotrigine Adverse events on generic unrelated to the small, allowable pharmacokinetic differences between generic and brand-name
Privitera et al. [48] Randomized, double-blind, crossover study Repeated switching every 14 days, for 2 months Generic to generic lamotrigine 33 Adults (aged ≥ 18 years) with epilepsy from six epilepsy centers receiving immediate-release lamotrigine Bioequivalence of generic lamotrigine products (high and low) in patients with epilepsy

No significant change in adverse events

No study-related serious adverse events

Berg et al. [49] Crossover, prospective, sequence-randomized, replicate pharmacokinetic study Subtherapeutic single-dose switching after washout period Two generic lamotrigine formulations and brand-name lamotrigine 50 Adults (≥ 18 years) with epilepsy on concomitant ASM and not currently receiving lamotrigine Bioequivalence of generic lamotrigine-high and generic lamotrigine-low to brand-name lamotrigine

Most adverse events were mild and unrelated to treatment

Adverse events not related to a particular product

Vari et al. [40] Prospective study Switch from brand-name to generic ASM Brand-name levetiracetam to generic levetiracetam 59 Patients with primary, cryptogenic or symptomatic epilepsy No increase of seizures and adverse effects after switching from brand-name to generic levetiracetam

3.4% switchback rate

Increased adverse effects on generic levetiracetam in 2 (3.4%)

Increased seizure on generic levetiracetam in 2 (3.4%)

Markoula et al. [42] Prospective, open-label, non-randomized, steady-state, multiple-dose, bioequivalence study One switch after 4 weeks Brand-name levetiracetam to generic levetiracetam 12 Patients with epilepsy receiving brand-name levetiracetam bioequivalence of generic levetiracetam to brand-name levetiracetam No significant change in adverse events
Bosak et al. [38] Retrospective study (mostly forced) switch to generic ASM Brand-name levetiracetam to generic levetiracetam 151 Patients with epilepsy receiving levetiracetam Switching from brand-name to generic levetiracetam is generally safe

Nine patients (6%) had increased frequency of seizures

Six patients (4%) had adverse events

Reimers et al. [43] Naturalistic, open, prospective, two-center study Overnight switch to generic ASM Brand-name levetiracetam to generic levetiracetam 33 Patients with epilepsy receiving levetiracetam Equal fluctuation of levetiracetam serum concentrations with brand-name and generic levetiracetam N/A
Fanella et al. [44] Observational study Switch to generic ASM Brand-name levetiracetam to generic levetiracetam 36 Seizure-free patients with epilepsy receiving levetiracetam Slight, non-statistically significant variability in levetiracetam serum concentration was documented after the switch

8% switchback rate

3 patients dropped out due to adverse events

Gha-hyun and Dae [37] Prospective study Switch from brand-name to generic ASM Brand-name levetiracetam to generic levetiracetam 148 Patients with epilepsy who were treated with brand-name levetiracetam for at least 6 months of sustained use

Minimal risk of increased seizure frequency after generic substitution

Increased seizure frequency was noted in seven patients (4.7%), and a decreased seizure frequency was noted in 10 (6.8%)

No significant change in adverse events
Trimboli et al. [41] Prospective observational real-life study Switch from brand-name to generic ASM Brand-name levetiracetam to generic levetiracetam 125 Patients with epilepsy who were treated with brand-name levetiracetam mono- or polytherapy for at least 6 months of sustained use brand-name-to-generic levetiracetam switching was effective and safe in both monotherapy and polytherapy regardless of the epilepsy syndrome 24% of patients treated with generic monotherapy reported adverse effects, some leading to treatment discontinuation
Tharavichitkun et al. [50] Retrospective study Switch from brand-name to generic ASM for 6 months, then switch back Brand-name levetiracetam to generic levetiracetam 75 Patients with stable seizure frequency Generic levetiracetam might not show therapeutic equivalence to the original molecule, especially in patients adequately controlled by the brand-name drug 8% experienced adverse events after brand-name to generic substitution
Liang et al. [39] Retrospective study Switch from brand-name to domestic generic ASM Brand-name levetiracetam to generic levetiracetam 154 Children with epilepsy Switching from brand-name to generic levetiracetam is safe and effective 3 children (1.9%) experienced mild adverse drug reactions
Lang et al. [51] Retrospective study, database analysis Switch by the manufacturer of the same ASM at the last prescription before the index date Any 678 Children and adolescents (< 18 years) with epilepsy and at least 2 prescriptions within 360 days and 1 within 180 days prior to the index date Manufacturer switch of generic or brand-name ASM does not increase the risk for seizure recurrence in previously seizure-free children and adolescents with epilepsy N/A
Lang et al. [52] Retrospective study, database analysis Switch by the manufacturer of the same ASM at the last prescription before the index date Any 3530 Patients with epilepsy and at least 2 prescriptions within 360 days and 1 within 180 days prior to the index date Manufacturer switch of ASM increases the risk for seizure recurrence in previously seizure-free patients N/A
Kesselheim et al. 2016 [59] Population-based case-crossover study Refill of the same ASM from the same manufacturer or a different manufacturer Any 83,001 Generic ASM users who experienced a seizure-related hospital admission or emergency room Switch to a different generic manufacturer not associated with increased risk Use of generic ASM associated with 8% increase in odds of seizure-related events
Hansen et al. 2013 [53] Retrospective case–control study Switch between bioequivalent ASM (brand-name to generic, generic to brand-name, generic to generic) Any 1053 Patients with epilepsy with a claim for an ambulance encounter, emergency department (ED) visit, or inpatient hospitalization Modest association between ASM switching and seizure-related events N/A
Polard et al. 2015 [60] Case crossover study Brand-name to generic substitution Any 8379 Adult patients with epilepsy No association between brand-name-to-generic ASM substitution and risk of seizure-related hospitalization N/A

Studies in table are organized chronologically by the type of drug switched

ASM Antiseizure medication, N/A not available

aItalics indicates positive outcome (bioequivalence of ASM switch); bold-italics indicates negative outcome (no bioequivalence)