Skip to main content
. 2023 Jun 22;1167:353–382. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.1167.103713

Table 5.

Significant p-values from the results of the ANOVA and Turkey HSD analyses comparing all combinations of species pairs. Abbreviations are in the Materials and methods.

Morphological characters SVL TrunkL HeadL HeadW SnEye NarEye EyeD SnW Chin CN SL VS DS SL1F SL1T
lungcuensis sp. nov. vs. banaensis 0.002 <0.001 0.005 <0.001 <0.001 0.002 0.002 0.002
typus vs. lungcuensis sp. nov. 0.003 0.026 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
lungcuensis sp. nov. vs. kiziriani 0.004 0.00 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 0.00 0.00
ngocsonensis vs. lungcuensis sp. nov. <0.001 0.032 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
typus-lungcuensis <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 0.026 0.003
yanshanensis vs. lungcuensis sp. nov. 0.03 0.002 0.00
lungcuensis sp. nov. vs. bonkowskii 0.008 <0.001 <0.001 0.02 0.002 0.002 0.00 0.00 0.00
lungcuensis sp. nov. vs. hongkongensis <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
lungcuensis sp. nov. vs. huishuiensis <0.001 <0.001
nahangensis vs. lungcuensis sp. nov. <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
zugi c lungcuensis sp. nov. <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
lungcuensis sp. nov. vs. dupanglingensis 0.027
serpispecus vs. lungcuensis sp. nov. <0.001 <0.001