Skip to main content
. 2023 Jul 1;152(Suppl 1):e2022060352I. doi: 10.1542/peds.2022-060352I

TABLE 1.

Testing Program Characteristics by Site

Site Type of Testing Program Total Number of Participants Tested Total Number of Tests Performed 1 Test per Participanta, n (%) 2–4 Tests per Participanta, n (%) 5+ Tests per Participanta, n (%) Average Number of Tests per Participantb
Children's Mercy and ICF Diagnostic or symptomatic, exposure; school-based PCR 359 399 313 (87.2) 46 (12.8) 0 (0) 1.1
Duke University TTS; school-based antigen 4576 10568 1319 (28.8) 3068 (67) 189 (4.1) 2.3
San Diego State University Diagnostic or symptomatic, exposure; school and home-based; antigen 635 1392 328 (51.7) 264 (41.6) 43 (6.8) 2.2
University of Miami Diagnostic or symptomatic, exposure; school-based PCR 542 680 384 (70.8) 158 (29.2) 0 (0) 1.3
University of Rochester Diagnostic or symptomatic, TTS, exposure; school and home-based; PCR 176 294 79 (44.9) 96 (54.5) 1 (0.6) 1.7
Washington University School of Medicine Diagnostic or symptomatic, exposure; school, home, and community-based PCR 1927 2311 1673 (86.8) 230 (11.9) 24 (1.2) 1.2
Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis and Special School District of St Louis county Diagnostic or symptomatic, exposure; school and home-based; PCR 66 98 51 (77.3) 12 (18.2) 3 (4.5) 1.5
All sites 8281 15742 4147 (50.1) 3874 (46.8) 260 (3.1) 1.9

ICF, The Inner City Fund; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; TTS, test-to-stay.

a

Percentages are calculated based on the total number of participants tested.

b

Calculated as number total number of tests performed divided by total number of participants tested.