TABLE 1.
Proposed method |
JP-SP |
|||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sample-based |
BT-based |
|||||||||
Bias | SD | SE | Cov | LCov | SE | Cov | LCov | Bias | Cov | |
100 | 160 | 784 | 1111 | 94.28 | 95.62 | 818 | 94.72 | 94.22 | 424 | 85.98 |
200 | 85 | 570 | 739 | 93.14 | 94.42 | 597 | 94.68 | 95.06 | 409 | 80.12 |
500 | 43 | 358 | 444 | 94.76 | 95.24 | 382 | 95.52 | 95.18 | 396 | 68.90 |
1000 | 19 | 265 | 300 | 93.78 | 94.18 | 270 | 94.36 | 94.40 | 388 | 51.44 |
100 | 68 | 777 | 1037 | 95.54 | 96.36 | 822 | 95.62 | 96.58 | 116 | 93.48 |
200 | 25 | 557 | 682 | 94.64 | 95.46 | 582 | 95.00 | 95.68 | 103 | 91.36 |
500 | 13 | 354 | 410 | 95.00 | 95.22 | 367 | 95.08 | 95.38 | 103 | 92.04 |
1000 | 4 | 254 | 277 | 94.8 | 94.98 | 257 | 94.82 | 94.96 | 95 | 90.12 |
, | ||||||||||
100 | 17 | 736 | 943 | 95.38 | 96.28 | 788 | 95.64 | 96.94 | −65 | 94.32 |
200 | 1 | 537 | 634 | 95.08 | 95.74 | 554 | 94.94 | 95.40 | −72 | 92.92 |
500 | 5 | 334 | 377 | 95.28 | 95.66 | 346 | 95.28 | 95.48 | −68 | 93.02 |
1000 | 2 | 238 | 259 | 94.82 | 94.98 | 243 | 94.76 | 94.90 | −72 | 92.82 |
, | ||||||||||
100 | −10 | 706 | 874 | 95.18 | 96.24 | 750 | 95.36 | 96.64 | −172 | 94.32 |
200 | −6 | 510 | 588 | 95.20 | 95.78 | 525 | 95.14 | 95.70 | −176 | 92.34 |
500 | 2 | 315 | 352 | 94.98 | 95.12 | 326 | 94.50 | 94.70 | −172 | 90.64 |
1000 | 2 | 226 | 242 | 95.04 | 95.12 | 229 | 94.84 | 94.92 | −173 | 85.90 |
BT-based, bootstrap-based; JP-SP, semiparametric method using the normal linear model of Janes and Pepe (2009); Bias, ; SD, standard deviation (×104); SE, mean standard error (×104); Cov (%) and LCov (%), coverage rates of 95% confidence interval and logit transformation-based confidence interval.