Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Jun 30.
Published in final edited form as: Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2020 Oct 18;68(2):e28767. doi: 10.1002/pbc.28767

TABLE 3.

EMA acceptability ratings

Item (mean) N = 18 Not at all/A littlen (%) Somewhatn (%) A lot/Completelyn (%)
Surveys had manytechnical glitchesa (0.56) 15 (83.3) 3 (16.7) 0 (0)
Comfortable with the questions on the surveys (3.11) 1 (5.6) 4 (22.2) 13 (72.2)
Hard to find the time to answer surveysa (1.11) 13 (72.2) 2 (11.1) 3 (16.7)
Surveys increased awareness of taking 6MP (2.78) 0 (0) 8 (44.4) 10 (55.6)
Surveys were helpful (2.44) 2 (11.1) 9 (50.0) 7 (38.9)
Interested in text messaging with oncology team (2.22) 4 (22.2) 8 (44.4) 6 (33.3)
Surveys made me feel more motivated to take 6MP (2.17) 5 (27.8) 6 (33.3) 7 (38.9)
Surveys increased my independence with taking 6MP (2.11) 5 (27.8) 5 (27.8) 8 (44.4)
Surveys increased awareness of my physical health (1.72) 9 (50.0) 5 (27.8) 4 (22.2)
Surveys increased awareness of my mood/stressors (1.67) 7 (38.9) 7 (38.9) 4 (22.2)
Looked forward to taking the surveys (1.67) 8 (44.4) 7 (38.9) 3 (16.7)
Special pill bottle made me feel more motivated to take 6MP (1.56) 11 (61.1) 2 (11.1) 5 (27.8)
Just the right amount A bit too many Way too many
What do you think about the number of text message surveys? 7 (38.9) 10 (55.6) 1 (5.6)

Note. Acceptability items on scale of 0 (Not at all) to 4 (Completely).

a

Lower scores are more favorable ratings.