Table 4:
Characteristics | Intervention Group (IG1) | Intervention Group (IG2) | p a IG1 vs IG2 | Intervention Group (IG) | Waiting List Group (WLG) | p IG vs WLG |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(n = 44) | (n = 43) | (n = 87) | (n = 33) | |||
Gender | 0.19 | 0.24 | ||||
Female | 27 (61.4) | 32 (74.4) | 59 (67.8) | 26 (78.8) | ||
Male | 17 (38.6) | 11 (25.6) | 28 (32.2) | 7 (21.2) | ||
Ageb, mean (SD) in years | 49 (11.1) | 50 (12.0) | 0.29 | 49 (11.5) | 49 (11.1) | 0.81 |
Family situation | 0.06 | 0.65 | ||||
Single without resident children | 9 (20.5) | 6 (14.0) | 15 (17.2) | 4 (12.1) | ||
Single with resident children | 1 (2.3) | 6 (14.0) | 7 (8.0) | 3 (9.1) | ||
Married or cohabitating without resident children | 14 (31.8) | 18 (41.9) | 32 (36.8) | 10 (30.3) | ||
Married or cohabitating with resident children | 20 (45.5) | 11 (25.6) | 31 (35.6) | 16 (48.5) | ||
Other | 0 (0.0) | 2 (4.7) | 2 (2.3) | 0 (0.0) | ||
Level of education | 0.64 | 0.36 | ||||
Lower | 1 (2.3) | 0 (0.0) | 1 (1.1) | 1 (3.0) | ||
Medium | 3 (6.8) | 3 (7.0) | 6 (6.9) | 3 (9.1) | ||
General | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 1 (3.0) | ||
Higher | 32 (27.7) | 28 (65.1) | 60 (69.0) | 20 (60.6) | ||
Academic | 7 (15.9) | 9 (20.9) | 16 (18.4) | 8 (24.2) | ||
Other | 1 (2.3) | 3 (7.0) | 4 (4.6) | 0 (0.0) | ||
Course | 0.01* | 0.02* | ||||
Care | 21 (47.7) | 18 (41.9) | 39 (44.8) | 23 (69.7) | ||
Technology | 18 (40.9) | 7 (16.3) | 25 (28.7) | 2 (6.1) | ||
Economy | 4 (9.1) | 16 (34.0) | 20 (23.0) | 8 (24.2) | ||
Otherc | 1 (2.3) | 2 (4.7) | 3 (3.4) | 0 (0.0) | ||
Years of work experience | 0.42 | 0.09 | ||||
0–2 | 2 (4.5) | 0 (0.0) | 2 (2.3) | 1 (3.0) | ||
3–5 | 4 (9.1) | 2 (4.7) | 6 (6.9) | 0 (0.0) | ||
6–10 | 4 (9.1) | 5 (11.6) | 9 (10.3) | 0 (0.0) | ||
>11 | 34 (77.3) | 36 (83.7) | 70 (80.5) | 32 (97.0) | ||
Number of working hours per week | 0.48 | 0.10 | ||||
<24 | 5 (12.5) | 2 (5.3) | 7 (9.0) | 6 (20.0) | ||
25–32 | 8 (20.0) | 10 (26.3) | 18 (23.1) | 10 (33.3) | ||
≥33 | 27 (67.5) | 26 (68.4) | 53 (67.9) | 14 (46.7) |
Characteristics are presented in terms of means and standard deviations (SDs) for metric variables, and in terms of frequencies and percentages for categorical variables.
Crosstabs and Chi-square tests were used, except for ‘Age’ for which the Mann–Whitney U-test was used because of non-normality of the data.
Age was calculated at the start of the intervention. The starting date of the interventions differed across schools.
‘Other’ are teachers working for more than one course, e.g. Technology and Economy.