Skip to main content
. 2022 Dec 13;39(1):60–75. doi: 10.1007/s40616-022-00177-6

Table 3.

Interobserver agreement and procedural integrity

Interobserver agreement Procedural integrity
Participant Sessions (%) Mean (%) Range (%) Sessions (%) Mean (%) Range (%)
Luisa 20.0% 100% 100% 20.0% 100% 100%
Keysha 91.3% 99.2% 83.3–100% 91.3% 96.8% 50.0–100%*
Dolores 27.7% 98.7% 83.3–100% 27.7% 100% 100%
Julieta 75.7% 100% 100% 81.1% 98.8% 66.7–100%*
Keion 88.0% 100% 100% 88.0% 99.5% 66.7–100%*
Imani 75.0% 99.6% 83.3–100% 75.0% 98.9% 50.0–100%**

Percent of sessions with IOA, mean IOA, and range of IOA are shown in the left-most columns. Percent of sessions with procedural integrity, mean integrity, and range of integrity are shown in the right-most columns. *One session fell below 80% fidelity. **Two sessions fell below 80% fidelity