Skip to main content
. 2023 Feb 21;94(7):560–566. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2022-330608

Table 2.

Comparison of IEAD and IEPD value for GCIPL and pRNFL

NMOSD-ON versus HC NMOSD-ON versus NMOSD-NON
T value P value T value P value
All subjects
 pRNFL IEPD (%) −6.885 <0.001 −6.519 <0.001
 pRNFL IEAD (µm) −6.483 <0.001 −5.102 <0.001
 GCIPL IEPD (%) −6.566 <0.001 −6.928 <0.001
 GCIPL IEAD (µm) −6.338 <0.001 −5.663 <0.001
First attack only
 pRNFL IEPD (%) −6.162 <0.001 −5.892 <0.001
 pRNFL IEAD (µm) −5.969 <0.001 −5.677 <0.001
 GCIPL IEPD (%) −6.570 <0.001 −6.024 <0.001
 GCIPL IEAD (µm) −6.357 <0.001 −5.778 <0.001
Recent onset (<10 years)
 pRNFL IEPD (%) −6.527 <0.001 −6.201 <0.001
 pRNFL IEAD (µm) −6.054 <0.001 −5.708 <0.001
 GCIPL IEPD (%) −5.768 <0.001 −5.274 <0.001
 GCIPL IEAD (µm) −5.530 <0.001 −5.014 <0.001

GCIPL, combined ganglion cell and inner plexiform layer; HC, healthy control; IEAD, intereye absolute difference; IEPD, intereye percentage difference; NMOSD-NON, patients with aquaporin-4-antibody seropositive neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders and no history of optic neuritis; NMOSD-ON, patients with aquaporin-4-antibody seropositive neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders and a history of unilateral optic neuritis; ON, optic neuritis; pRNFL, peripapillary retinal nerve fibre layer.