Skip to main content
. 2023 Jun 20;4(6):101089. doi: 10.1016/j.xcrm.2023.101089

Table 2.

What SPRINT-MIND showed: Cognitive and MRI outcomes

Intensive treatment Standard treatment
Adjudicated cognitive impairment (N = 8563, median follow-up = 5.1 years)
Cases per Cases per Hazard ratio
Outcome 1,000 person-years 1,000 person-years (95% CI)a p value Reference
Probable dementia 7.2 8.6 0.83 (0.67–1.04) 0.10 Williamson et al.15
Mild cognitive impairment 14.6 18.3 0.81 (0.69–0.95) 0.007
Composite of MCI or probable dementia 20.2 24.1 0.85 (0.74–0.97) 0.01
Cognitive decline outcomes (N = 2921, median follow-up = 4.1 years)
Yearly Yearly Difference
Outcome Slope (95% CI)b Slope (95% CI)b (95% CI) p value Reference
Memory domainc −0.005 −0.001 −0.004 0.33 Rapp et al.25
(−0.01 to 0.001) (−0.006 to 0.005) (−0.012 to 0.004)
Processing domaind −0.025 −0.015 −0.01 0.02
(−0.03 to −0.019) (−0.021 to −0.009) (−0.017 to −0.002)
MRI outcomes (baseline N = 670, median follow-up = 4.0 years)
Mean change Mean change Difference
Outcome (95% CI)e (95% CI)e (95% CI) p value Reference
White matter lesion volume, cm3 0.92 1.45 −0.54 <0.001 Williamson et al. 201915; Nasrallah et al. 202128; Dolui et al. 2022.27
(0.69–1.14) (1.21–1.70) (-0.87 to −0.20)
Total brain volume, cm3 −30.60 −26.9 −3.7 0.006
(−32.3 to −28.8) (−28.8 to −24.9) (−6.3 to −1.1)
Hippocampal volume, cm3 −0.06 −0.02 −0.033 0.03
(−0.08 to −0.04) (−0.05 to 0.00) (−0.062 to −0.003)
Whole brain CBF, mL/100 g/min 1.46 −0.84 2.3 0.02
(0.08–2.83) (−2.30 to 0.61) (0.30–4.30)
a

Intensive treatment versus standard treatment based on stratified Cox proportional hazards regression model.

b

Yearly slope assuming a linear trend based on a linear mixed model.

c

Includes the Logical Memory I and II, Modified Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure (immediate recall), and the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test, Revised (delayed recall).

d

Includes the Trail Making Test (parts A and B) and Digit Symbol Coding.

e

For MRI outcomes, change estimates at 3.98 years post randomization based on a linear mixed model minimally adjusting for intracranial volume and days since randomization, including random effects for participant and imaging facility. Estimates for white matter lesion volume are based on a robust mixed model formulation given the skewed distribution of that outcome. Estimates for hippocampal volume and CBF also adjusted for age and sex.