Skip to main content
. 2023 Jun 8;60:102036. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.102036

Table 4.

Random slopes model results for ALSFRS-R, ALSSQOL-SF, FVC in the OLE period.

Slope change
Points/Month
Randomisation to Week 48 (12-weeks post OLE Baseline) 24 Weeks post OLE baseline (Week 60 to Week 120)
ALSFRS-R Random Slopes Model
Original Active −0.796 −0.447
Original Placebo −1.166 −0.843
Slope Difference (SE) 0.364 (0.149) 0.397 (0.139)
95% CI of Slope Difference 0.070 to 0.659 0.119 to 0.674
Period Ending Difference (Active Less Placebo) 2.6 6.0
p-value 0.0159 0.0057
FVC (% predicted) Random Slopes Model
Original Active −2.05 −2.2
Original Placebo −2.05 −2.2
Slope Difference (SE) 0 0
95% CI of Slope Difference NA NA
Period Ending Difference (Active Less Placebo) 6.9 5.3
p-value NS NS
ALSSQOL-SF Random Slopes Model
Original Active −0.010 0.124
Original Placebo −0.136 −0.006
Slope Difference (SE) 0.127 (0.035) 0.119 (0.037)
95% CI of Slope Difference 0.057 to 0.196 0.045 to 0.192
Period Ending Difference (Active Less Placebo) 1.0 2.9
p-value 0.0004 0.0018

The random slope models incorporated covariates including delta-FS, time from symptom onset, treatment assignment, and time (days). Backward selection was used to minimise the Akaike information criterion (AIC) to determine final model terms.