Skip to main content
. 2023 Mar 22;192(3):2507–2522. doi: 10.1093/plphys/kiad188

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Role of PSKR1 in defense of tomato plants against B. cinerea. A) Schematic illustration of the sgRNA target site (red arrows) in WT PSKR1 and two alleles (pskr1#2 and pskr1#4) from CRISPR/Cas 9 edited T2 mutant lines. The deleted nucleotide sequences of each line are labeled in red. pskr1#2 and pskr1#4 contained a premature stop codon at 326th and 391th amino acid of the PSKR1 protein, respectively. B) Identification of PSKR1 overexpression lines by immunoblot with an anti-HA antibody. Ponceau S (Ponc.) staining was used as a protein loading control. C) Effects of PSKR1 on the transcript abundance of PSK-responsive genes MRN1 and RLKR. The transcript abundance of each gene in WT plants was defined as 1. D to G) Disease symptoms in PSKR1 mutated and overexpressed lines inoculated with B. cinerea. Five-wk-old tomato plants were sprayed with B. cinerea spore suspension. D) Representative images of trypan blue staining for cell death in indicated tomato leaves at 3 d postinoculation with B. cinerea (dpi). Bar = 250 μm. E) Representative chlorophyll fluorescence imaging of ΦPSII at 3 dpi. The value below each individual image indicates the degree of ΦPSII. F) Relative B. cinerea ACTIN transcript abundance in infected tomato leaves at 1 dpi. The transcript abundance of B. cinerea ACTIN in WT plants was defined as 1. G) Effects of PSKR1 on the gene expression of B. cinerea-induced gene PAD3 and SAG12 in indicated tomato plants at 1 dpi. The transcript abundance of each gene under mock treatment in WT plants was defined as 1. Data are presented in (C, E to G) as the means of three biological replicates (±SD, n = 3), and different letters indicate significant differences (P < 0.05) according to Tukey's test.