Skip to main content
. 2023 May 4;12(12):13361–13373. doi: 10.1002/cam4.6036

TABLE 3.

Sensitivity analysis.

Competing‐risk models Sensitivity analysis
HR (95% CI) p HR (95% CI) p
RDW
<13.5% <0.01 0.01
≥13.5% 1.54 (1.12–2.24) 2.01 (1.18–3.42)
ΔRDW
<0.9% <0.01 0.24
≥0.9% 1.78 (1.29–2.44) 1.44 (0.79–2.63)

Note: Competing‐risk models, Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) of RDW and ΔRDW were calculated by cause‐specific hazards model; Sensitivity analysis, Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were calculated by Cox proportional hazards models when inclued early‐stage patients (stage 0–II).