Skip to main content
. 2022 Aug 1;28(8):1170–1179. doi: 10.14744/tjtes.2021.00310

Table 1.

Patient demographics, mechanism of injury, addiotional injuries and types acetabulum of fractures; the study includes 61 patients

Surgically treated group (n=30) Conservatively treated group (n=31)
Demographics
 Male 25 27
 Female 5 4
 Average age 48.93±2.9 50.22±2.24
Trauma types
 Traffic accident inside the vehicle (n=31) 15 16
 Traffic accident outside the vehicle (n=11) 8 3
 Direct trauma (n=6) 1 5
 Fall from height (n=13) 6 7
Acetabulum fracture types
 Posterior wall (n=12) 5 7
 Posterior column (n=4) 3 1
  Anterior Wall (n=–)
 Anterior column (n=16) 8 8
 Transvers (n=2) 1 1
 T-type (n=2) 1 1
 Posterior column and posterior wall (n=9) 5 4
 Transvers and posterior wall (n=8) 3 5
 Anterior column and posterior hemitransverse (n=1) 1
 Both column (n=7) 3 4
Additional injuries
 Iliac crest fracture (n=12) 7 5
 Sacroiliac dislocation (n=8) 2 6
 Spinal fracture (n=5) 3 2
 Pubic arm fracture (n=14) 6 8
 Pubic diastasis (n=3) 1 2
 Acetabulum central or posterior dislocation (n=8) 4 4
 Accompanying extremity fracture (n=24) 16 8