Skip to main content
. 2022 Aug 1;28(8):1170–1179. doi: 10.14744/tjtes.2021.00310

Table 2.

Categorization of acetabular fractures according to Judet and Letournel classification

Judet and Letournel classification Surgically treated group (n=30) Conservatively treated group (n=31) p* p**


n % n %
Elementary fracture (n=33)
 JT1 (n=12) 5 16.0 7 22.5 0.168 0.527
 JT2(n=4) 3 10 1 3.2
 JT3 (n=0)
 JT4 (n=16) 8 26 8 25.8
 JT5 (n=2) 1 3.3 1 3.2
Associated fracture (n=28)
 JT6 (n=2) 1 3.3 1 3.2
 JT7 (n=9) 5 16.7 4 12.9
 JT8 (n=8) 3 10.0 5 16.6
 JT9 (n=1) 1 3.3 0
 JT10 (n=7) 3 10.0 4 12.9

Chi-square test, p<0.05 statistically significant.

*

All are according to Judet and Letournel classification.

**

According to elementary and associated fracture classification.