Table 2. Comparison of the Simulation and Experimental Results for Our Six Fabricated Metal Meshesa.
| Simulations |
Experiments |
||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number | Sample | T (%) | SE (dB) | Rs (Ω/sq) | T (%) | SE (dB) | Rs (Ω/sq) |
| 1 | W1P25t0.5 | 89.9 | 44.8 | 1.84 | 87.2 | 48.0 | 2.47 |
| 2 | W1P25t0.8 | 87.6 | 49.3 | 0.95 | 83.0 | 58.4 | 1.33 |
| 3 | W2P40t1.0 | 86.5 | 44.9 | 0.58 | 87.4 | 46.3 | 1.16 |
| 4 | W2P40t1.6 | 84.6 | 53.1 | 0.35 | 83.9 | 54.0 | 0.71 |
| 5 | W3P70t1.0 | 90.3 | 38.1 | 0.75 | 90.3 | 48.3 | 0.99 |
| 6 | W3P70t2.0 | 86.2 | 52.7 | 0.29 | 84.9 | 52.8 | 0.46 |
a
The transparency (T) at 550 nm, average shielding efficiency (SE) from 8 to 18 GHz, and sheet resistance (Rs) are all presented.