Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr 6;147(9):909–921. doi: 10.1017/S003118202000058X

Table 3.

Prevalence of Dirofilaria immitis in canines according to year, host, location, gender, age and diagnostic method in Iran up to 1 December 2019

Subgroup variable Prevalence (95% CI) I2 (%) Heterogeneity (Q) P value Interaction test (X2) P value
Year
<2011 11.58 (7.37–16.60) 84% 62.5 P < 0.001 177.1 P < 0.001
⩾2011 16.25 (10.23–23.35) 96% 596.4 P < 0.001
Host
Wild Canines 10.72 (6.59–15.70) 0% 0.2 P = 0.963 123.9 P < 0.001
Owned dogs 6.61 (3.46–10.68) 88.1% 84.2 P < 0.001
Stray dogs 20.92 (13.84–29.03) 95.6% 453.7 P < 0.001
Location
North 13.59 (7.29–21.46) 88.3% 59.6 P < 0.001 123.1 P < 0.001
South 6.10 (3.40–9.51) 65.1% 11.4 P = 0.021
East 9.03 (3.15–17.52) 92% 74.5 P < 0.001
West 25.29 (14.44–37.99) 95.4% 173.1 P < 0.001
Centre 20.60 (5.93–41.13) 96.7% 121.1 P < 0.001
Gender
Male 10.07 (5.10–16.47) 87.9% 99.4 P < 0.001 89.1 P = 0.131
Female 9.23 (3.68–16.97) 87.3% 86.9 P < 0.001
Age
<1 Year old 8.40 (0.01– 32.00) 77% 13.0 P = 0.004 10.8 P = 0.006
⩾1 Year old 20.77 (8.66–36.42) 90.1% 40.5 P < 0.001
Diagnostic method
Serological 16.95 (4.98–34.08) 96.6% 146.9 P < 0.001 110.0 P = 0.010
Microscopic 13.86 (9.46– 18.94) 92% 286.0 P < 0.001
PCR 16.09 (3.51–35.38) 97.7% 215.8 P < 0.001