Skip to main content
. 2020 Jun 24;147(11):1249–1253. doi: 10.1017/S0031182020001031

Table 2.

GLM comparing the FEC between the three devices, McMaster, Mini-FLOTAC and Telenostic and the two methods (manual and automatic) of determining FEC in the Telenostic device

Term Estimate s.e. Statistic P value
Sample A (Intercept) 4.514282 0.136416 33.09195 <0.001
Method-MiniFLOTAC −0.24846 0.159377 −1.55895 0.119
Method-TelenosticAutomatic 0.109316 0.157639 0.693461 0.488
Method-TelenosticManual 0.035332 0.157951 0.223691 0.823
Replicate A.2 −0.195 0.136715 −1.42635 0.154
Replicate A.3 −0.27706 0.137072 −2.02131 0.043
Sample B (Intercept) 6.07003 0.085825 70.72566 <0.001
Method-MiniFLOTAC −0.34821 0.099147 −3.51206 <0.001
Method-TelenosticAutomatic −0.06224 0.098782 −0.63004 0.529
Method-TelenosticManual −0.15747 0.098892 −1.59237 0.111
Replicate B.2 0.447947 0.085832 5.218895 <0.001
Replicate B.3 0.268887 0.085995 3.126778 0.002
Sample C (Intercept) 4.488078 0.121995 36.78912 <0.001
Method-MiniFLOTAC −0.29351 0.141846 −2.06922 0.039
Method-TelenosticAutomatic 0.115006 0.139995 0.821503 0.411
Method-TelenosticManual 0.072569 0.140155 0.517773 0.605
Replicate C.2 0.119264 0.122013 0.977475 0.328
Replicate C.3 0.106008 0.12206 0.868492 0.385