Table 2.
Study | Subjects | Age (years) | Exercise | Main outcomes | Effect of age on magnitude of change | Effect of age on time to recovery | Other findings |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Clarkson and Dedrick [50] | 20 healthy females (10 young, 10 older) | 24 ± 3, 67 ± 5 |
24 reps eccentric contractions of elbow flexors 115% maximal isometric strength |
Relaxed elbow angle Flexed elbow angle Muscle soreness CK |
↑* ↔ ↔ ↔ |
↑ ↔ ↔ Not recovered (120-h) |
|
Dedrick and Clarkson [51] | 20 healthy females (10 young, 10 older) | 24 ± 3, 67 ± 5 |
24 reps eccentric contractions of elbow flexors 115% maximal isometric strength |
MIVC Muscle soreness Reaction time Movement time |
↑ ↔ ↔ ↔ |
↑ ↔ ↔ ↔ |
No significant difference in magnitude of strength loss, but older recovered more slowly |
Ploutz-Snyder et al. [52] | 12 healthy females (6 young, 6 older) | 23 ± 4, 66 ± 5 |
10 × 10 reps unilateral eccentric contractions of knee extensors 75% eccentric 1-RM |
Concentric 1-RM Eccentric 1-RM |
↑* ↑* |
↑ ↑ |
12-wk RT programme attenuated declines in muscular strength, losing only 14% (Con) and 12% (Ecc) of 1-RM strength |
reps repetitions, 1-RM one-repetition maximum, MIVC maximal isometric voluntary contraction, CK creatine kinase, Con concentric, Ecc Eccentric, h hours, wk week, ↑ increase, ↔ no change
*Significantly different from baseline