Skip to main content
. 2023 May 12;66(8):1481–1500. doi: 10.1007/s00125-023-05925-4

Table 2.

MR estimates examining the association of genetically proxied perturbation of PPARG with site-specific and overall cancer risk

Outcome N (cases; controls) OR (95% CI) p value
Breast cancer 122,977; 105,974 0.67 (0.43, 1.04) 0.08
 ER+ breast cancer 69,501; 105,974 0.57 (0.38, 0.85) 6.45×10−3
 ER breast cancer 21,468; 105,974 1.14 (0.64, 2.01) 0.66
Colorectal cancer 58,221; 67,694 0.95 (0.51, 1.75) 0.86
 Colon cancer 32,002; 64,159 1.22 (0.72, 2.08) 0.46
 Rectal cancer 16,212; 64,159 0.82 (0.25, 2.71) 0.75
Prostate cancer 79,148; 61,106 1.75 (1.07, 2.85) 0.02
 Advanced prostate cancera 15,167; 58,308 1.64 (0.62, 4.33) 0.32
Overall cancer risk 27,483; 372,016 0.72 (0.44, 1.19) 0.20

ORs (95% CIs) are scaled to represent the effect of genetically proxied perturbation of PPARG equivalent to a 1 unit lowering of IRNT HbA1c (mmol/mol)

aAdvanced prostate cancer is defined as metastatic disease, Gleason score ≥8, prostate-specific antigen >100 or prostate cancer-related death