Table 2:
Characteristics of included studies evaluating facility-level factors and rehabilitation outcomes for those undergoing total knee or hip replacements.
Author (Year) Location |
Study Design / Data Source (Years of data) |
Setting # Patients and description # Facilities and description |
Sample Description % Female Mean Age±SD (years) % Race/Ethnicity |
---|---|---|---|
Chimenti et al. (2007) New York |
Prospective study (2003–2004) |
212 patients receiving home physical therapy following total knee replacement surgery | Female: 68.9% Age: 70.0±9.7 White: 92.5% Black: 7.1% Hispanic/Other: 0.4% |
DeJong et al. (2009a) United States |
Prospective cohort study Joint Replacement Outcomes in Inpatient Rehabilitation Facilities and Nursing Treatment Sites (JOINTS) I (2006–2007) |
2,152 patients with elective hip (34.9%) or knee replacement (65.1%) 1 hospital-based and 8 freestanding skilled nursing facilities 11 inpatient rehabilitation facilities |
Female: 70.6% Age: 71.2±10.2 White: 81.4% |
DeJong et al. (2009b) United States |
Prospective cohort study Joint Replacement Outcomes in Inpatient Rehabilitation Facilities and Nursing Treatment Sites (JOINTS) I, II (2006–2007) |
856 patients with elective hip (34.5%) or knee replacement (65.5%) 1 hospital-based and 5 freestanding skilled nursing facilities 6 inpatient rehabilitation facilities |
Female: 72.3% Age: 71.6±9.7 White: 77.1% |
Munin et al. (2010) United States |
Prospective cohort study Joint Replacement Outcomes in Inpatient Rehabilitation Facilities and Nursing Treatment Sites (2006 to 2007) |
218 patients with hip fracture treated with hemiarthroplasty or total hip arthroplasty 6 freestanding skilled nursing facilities 11 inpatient rehabilitation facilities |
Female: 78.4% Age: 76.9±11.2 White: 86.7% |
Herbold et al. (2011) New York |
Prospective cohort study* (2006 to 2008) |
102 matched pairs of patients with unilateral hip fracture, total knee replacement, or total hip replacement discharged to 5 skilled nursing facilities or an inpatient rehabilitation facility | Female: 73.0% Age: 74.1±10.5 White: 84.3% Black: 8.3% Latino: 4.9% Asian: 0.1% |
Mallinson et al. (2011) Eleven unspecified states in the midwest and northeast |
Prospective cohort study (2005 to 2008) |
230 patients with hip (36.5%) or knee (63.5%) replacements or revisions 5 skilled nursing facilities 4 inpatient rehabilitation facilities 6 home health agencies |
Female: 70.9% Age: 75.6±5.9 White: 95.2% Black: 3.9% |
Tian et al. (2012) United States |
Prospective cohort study Appears to be Joint Replacement Outcomes in Inpatient Rehabilitation Facilities and Nursing Treatment Sites (JOINTS) (2006–2007) |
1,566 patients with elective hip (39.5%) or knee replacement (60.5%) 7 skilled nursing facilities 11 inpatient rehabilitation facilities |
Female: 70.9% Age: 71.9±10.3 White: 80.7% |
Padgett et al. (2018) New York |
Prospective cohort study Total joint replacement registry data (2007 to 2011) |
1,213 matched pairs of patients with total knee arthroplasty discharged to home matched to rehabilitation facility 492 matched pairs of patients with total knee arthroplasty discharged to rehabilitation facility or skilled nursing facilities |
Female: Not reported Age: Not reported White: Not reported |
Fleischman et al. (2019) | Randomized trial (2016 to 2018) |
290 patients who received primary total knee arthroplasty | Female: 51.0% Age: 65±Not reported Race/ethnicity: Not reported |
The manuscript states that this is a quasi-experimental case control study design.The matched patients with patients with joint replacements discharged to inpatient rehabilitation facilities to those discharged to skilled nursing facilities and then compared outcomes. Because they selected on the basis of exposure (care setting) and followed patients for outcomes, we classified this study as a prospective cohort study.