Skip to main content
. 2023 Jan 18;11(4):817–826. doi: 10.14218/JCTH.2022.00329

Table 3. Diagnostic performance of LSM for predicting significant and severe inflammation in the internal, external, and prospective validation groups.

AUC (95%CI) Cutoff values Accuracy (%) Sensitivity/ specificity (%) PPV/NPV (%)
Training group (n=227)
  A≥2 0.803 (0.746–0.853) 6.3 72.25 79.63/65.55 67.72/78.00
  A=3 0.765 (0.704–0.819) 7.5 63.00 84.62/61.68 11.83/98.51
Internal validation group (n=212)
  A≥2 0.796 (0.735–0.848) 6.3 73.58 84.62/62.96 68.75/80.95
  A=3 0.793 (0.732–0.845) 7.5 69.81 80.00/69.31 11.43/98.59
External validation group (n=84)
  A≥2 0.800 (0.669–0.880) 6.3 78.57 70.27/85.11 72.22/83.33
  A=3 0.937 (0.862–0.978) 7.5 78.57 100/77.22 21.74/100
Prospective validation group (n=96)
  A≥2 0.877 (0.790–0.937) 6.3 83.33 97.62/72.22 73.21/97.50
  A=3 0.937 (0.862–0.978) 7.5 78.13 100/76.40 25.00/100

AUC, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve; LSM, liver stiffness measurement; NPV, negative predictive value; PPV, positive predictive value.