Skip to main content
. 2023 Mar 3;119(7):1568–1582. doi: 10.1093/cvr/cvad037

Table 1.

Echocardiography 7 weeks after TAC

PLN-KO TgAFA-PLN P vs. PLN-KO TgPLN P vs. PLN-KO P vs. TgAFA-PLN
N 12 17 12
Pressure gradient (mm Hg) 68 ± 7 73 ± 5 0.94 70 ± 7 0.96 0.81
LVAW;d (mm) 1.25 ± 0.02 1.32 ± 0.02 0.29 1.24 ± 0.05 0.99 0.26
LVPW;d (mm) 1.24 ± 0.03 1.29 ± 0.02 0.61 1.24 ± 0.05 0.99 0.54
LVID;d (mm) 3.60 ± 0.11 3.52 ± 0.11 0.83 3.26 ± 0.10 0.10 0.21
LVID;s (mm) 2.64 ± 0.12 2.25 ± 0.13 0.08 1.85 ± 0.12 0.0006 0.08
FS (%) 27 ± 1 37 ± 2 0.005 44 ± 2 <0.0001 0.07
LV volume;d (μL) 55 ± 4 53 ± 4 0.85 44 ± 3 0.10 0.20
LV volume;s (μL) 27 ± 3 19 ± 2 0.07 11 ± 2 0.0005 0.08
LV mass (mg) 190 ± 8 198 ± 9 0.80 165 ± 11 0.24 0.05
heart rate (bpm) 589 ± 17 557 ± 13 0.34 540 ± 20 0.13 0.74

N, number of mice; transstenotic pressure gradient; LVAW, left ventricular anterior wall thickness; d, diastolic; LVPW, left ventricular posterior wall thickness; LVID, left ventricular internal dimension; s, systolic; FS, fractional shortening; bpm, beats per min; mean ± SEM; P-values were determined by one-way-ANOVA, values in bold indicate statistically significant results.