Skip to main content
. 2023 Jun 9;14:100321. doi: 10.1016/j.jvacx.2023.100321

Table 1.

Estimated median vaccine efficacy (VE) with 95% CIs (in brackets) calculated after 10, 20, 50, 100 and 200 simulated outbreaks, by varying the vaccination coverage, nominal VE and intervention/vaccination times. Baseline values: 50% coverage, 70% nominal VE, intervention and vaccination at 21 and 35 days, respectively.

Number of outbreaks 10 20 50 100 200
Baseline 83%
(--100%)
76%
(--100%)
67%
(--100%)
69% (0–100%) 67% (42–85%)
Higher Coverage
(70%)
82%
(--100%)
75%
(--100%)
70% (-50–100%) 67% (0–100%) 67%
(47–89%)
Lower Coverage
(30%)
100%
(--100%)
87%
(--100%)
78%
(--100%)
76%
(0–100%)
72%
(31–100%)
Higher Vaccine Efficacy
(90%)
100%
(--100%)
100%
(0–100%)
100%
(0–100%)
88%
(50–100%)
89%
(70–100%)
Lower Vaccine Efficacy (50%) 55%
(--100%)
52%
(--100%)
53% (-200–100%) 52%
(0–83%)
52%
(21–73%)
Later intervention and vaccination times (90 days after first case) 73%
(--100%)
75%
(--100%)
67% (-270–100%) 67%
(0–91%)
67%
(33–86%)
Earlier intervention and vaccination
times (14 days after first case)
74%
(--100%)
70%
(--100%)
69%
(-50%-100%)
67%
(0–87%)
67%
(43–80%)
Longer delay from vaccination to infection
(mean: 20 days)
78%
(--100%)
74%
(--100%)
72%
(0–100%)
71%
(50–93%)
71%
(58–84%)
R increases by 25% 79%
(--100%)
75%
(-- 100%)
71%
(0–100%)
72%
(39–92%)
69%
(53–85%)
R increases by 50% 75%
(--100%)
75%
(-100–100%)
72%
(29–93%)
71%
(47–86%)
70%
(59–82%)
Optimistic scenario, same R 79%
(--100%)
71%
(-4–100%)
69%
(33–100%)
71%
(48–86%)
70%
(57–80%)
Optimistic scenario, R increases by 50% 75%
(0–100%)
71%
(0–100%)
72%
(50–87%)
71%
(58–82%)
70%
(63–78%)

* The optimistic scenario involves a combination of: longer delay from vaccination to infection, higher coverage, earlier intervention and vaccination but retaining a 70% nominal VE.