Skip to main content
. 2023 Jun 13;79(1):1889. doi: 10.4102/sajp.v79i1.1889

TABLE 3.

Percentage scores per dimension.

Dimension n Median % Lower quartile % Upper quartile % Minimum % Maximum %
Uncertainty 8 62.2 60.0 78.9 57.8 91.1
Creativity 8 64.0 58.0 76.0 56.0 88.0
Physical 8 76.7 72.2 77.8 68.9 91.1
Learning 8 80.0 77.8 87.8 66.7 95.6
Interpersonal 8 85.7 84.3 91.4 77.1 100.0
Work stress 8 50.0 42.0 66.0 32.0 96.0
Cultural 8 84.0 74.0 94.0 72.0 100.0
Crisis 8 80.0 73.3 90.0 66.7 96.7

Source: Adapted from Ployhart, R.E. & Bliese, P.D., 2006, ‘Individual Adaptability (IADAPT) Theory: Conceptualizing the antecedents, consequences, and measurement of individual differences in adaptability’, in C. Shawn Burke, L.G. Pierce & E. Salas (eds.), Understanding adaptability: A prerequisite for effective performance within complex environments (Advances in human performance and cognitive engineering research, Vol. 6), pp. 3–39, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley

Note: Data in bold reflects lowest scoring dimensions.