Skip to main content
. 2023 Feb 3;227(7):917–925. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiad027

Table 3.

Performance of Genotype-Based Prediction of Susceptibility Calculated Using Previously Published Regression EquationsS Compared to the Phenotypic Susceptibility in a Collection of Neisseria gonorrhoeae Isolates From 5 Countries (N = 457)a

Antimicrobial MIC Breakpoint, μg/mL TP FP TN FN PPV, %
Est LCLb
Ciprofloxacin ≤0.06 104 0 353 0 100 97.2
≤0.5 130 57 268 2 69.5 63.5
Cefixime ≤0.06 255 104 29 67 71.0 66.8
≤0.125 370 83 1 1 81.7 78.4
≤0.25 436 19 0 0 95.8 93.9
Ceftriaxone ≤0.06 260 2 33 160 99.2 97.6
≤0.125 366 5 4 80 98.7 97.2
≤0.25 449 5 0 1 98.9 97.7
Azithromycin ≤0.5 409 5 9 30 98.8 97.5
≤1 437 2 5 9 99.5 98.6
Penicillin ≤ 0.06 0 0 442 13
≤1 110 3 241 101 97.3 93.3
Tetracycline ≤0.06 0 0 434 19
≤1 19 0 289 145 100 85.4

Abbreviations: FN, false-negative; FP, false-positive; LCL, lower confidence limit for 95% confidence interval; MIC, minimum inhibitory concentration; TN, true-negative; TP, true-positive.

Susceptibility predictions were based on regression equations from Demczuk et al [44] and were compared with phenotypically measured susceptibility.

LCL based on 1-sided 95% Clopper-Pearson confidence interval.