Skip to main content
. 2023 May 17;51(W1):W443–W450. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkad382

Table 1.

Performance runtime comparison (in s) between PHAST, PHASTER and PHASTEST using identical (new) hardware, but with different databases, search algorithms and query types using E. coli O157:H7 (NC_002655.2) as the query genome

Cumulative set of performance enhancements BLAST vs. phage database runtime (sec) BLAST vs. bacterial database runtime (sec) GenBank annotated genome runtime (sec) Unannotated genome runtime (sec)
PHAST (baseline) - current DBs, no other upgrades 191 576 270 899
PHASTER (baseline) - current DBs, no other upgrades 116 83 162 277
PHASTEST (upgrade 1) - BLAST+ parameter adjustment 82 82 144 229
PHASTEST (upgrade 2) - Whole-sequence Prodigal 81 71 141 201
PHASTEST (upgrade 3) - Parallel Diamond 84 124 118 266
PHASTEST (upgrade 4) - Swiss-Prot DB 80 64 110 195