Skip to main content
. 2023 Jan 26;7(13):2994–3004. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2022008514

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Frequencies of 3 tested additive KIR/KIR-ligand models. (A-C) Blue columns are displaying frequencies of patients with AML, and red columns are displaying the control group with the respective category of scores/counts of the considered KIR/KIR-ligand-models: inhibitory score based on the findings by Boelen et al,19 including KIR3DL1/HLA-Bw4 and considering KIR2DL2 and KIR2DL3 separately, with a cutoff of 1.75 (A); inhibitory count based on the findings by Boelen et al, including KIR3DL1/HLA-Bw4 and considering KIR2DL2 and KIR2DL3 separately, with a cutoff of 1.0 (B); and favorable and unfavorable score based on the criteria given by Rafei et al35 combining inhibitory and activating scores (C). The truncated version of KIR2DS4 is not considered as an activating KIR; unfavorable is defined by the presence of ≥3 inhibitory KIR/KIR-ligand matches and no activating KIR/KIR-ligand match. (D) Inhibitory/missing-ligand KIR score based on the criteria given by Krieger et al36 accounting for iKIRs and missing KIR ligands; adjusted P values are depicted above the pairs of columns.