Table 5.
Comparison of the classification performance of various balancing methods (%).
Method | Type | Macro-AUC | ACC | Macro-R | Macro-P | Macro-F1 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Original | None | 92.60 | 81.16 | 85.01 | 74.62 | 78.75 |
Random Oversample | Oversampling | 91.84 | 80.37 | 80.37 | 81.14 | 80.49 |
Random Undersample | Oversampling | 82.78 | 73.81 | 71.82 | 74.52 | 72.47 |
SMOTE | Undersampling | 90.98 | 85.93 | 86.10 | 85.85 | 85.85 |
ADASYN | Undersampling | 95.74 | 84.84 | 85.05 | 85.35 | 84.28 |
Borderline-SMOTE | Undersampling | 96.10 | 87.04 | 87.12 | 87.68 | 86.75 |
SMOTEENN | Mixed-sampling | 97.89 | 95.74 | 94.75 | 94.03 | 94.35 |