Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Bioeth. 2023 May 19;23(7):17–26. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2023.2207500

Table 1.

Rare Disease Stakeholders - Opportunities to Address Equity

Stakeholders Opportunities to Address Equity
Government funding agencies  • Critically review funding allocations across rare diseases for potential inequities in allocation.
 • Invest in integrated approaches to research to understand variation in outcomes within and across rare diseases.
Federal and state policymakers  • Promote regulatory supports for rare disease therapy development and coverage for new therapeutics.
 • Review targeted variants and cut-off levels used in NBS for racially and ethnically diverse communities.
 • Invest in systemic supports for robust short- and long-term follow-up of positive NBS screening results.
Industry partners  • Focus philanthropic donations on diverse patient communities
 • Invest in financial support and navigation programs for patients
 • Engage with diverse patient partners at all stages of research
 • Consider value-based payment arrangements for high-cost drugs
Researchers  • Engage with diverse patient partners at all stages of research
 • Evaluate research protocols to reduce burden on patient participants
Healthcare systems  • Work with existing pediatric complex care providers to support families
 • Develop parallel navigation programs for adults with rare diseases
Healthcare providers  • Develop educational materials for community providers around rare diseases, implicit bias, and care needs
 • Adopt patient-centered models of care coordination and communication
Public and private payers  • Develop internal programs to improve care coordination and support navigation
 • Explore pilot programs to fund complex care and coordination for rare disease patients
Patient and family groups  • Actively seek to diversify representation, leadership and decision-making within disease groups
 • Consider the potential downstream benefits and drawbacks of various funding priorities for socioeconomically and phenotypically diverse members of the patient community