Skip to main content
. 2023 Jul 5;3(7):e0001949. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0001949

Table 3. Antimalarial drug administration if children went to referral health facility (RHF) at any stage of the treatment-seeking pathway, went to at least one other provider which was not a referral health facility (non-RHF provider), or did not go to any other provider after seeing the first provider.

Children completing referral to RHF Children seeking treatment from non-RHF providers§ No second provider Total
N % N % N % N %
All 1192 100 927 100 92 100 2211 100
Case management*
 No antimalarial  treatment 62 5.2 43 4.6 7 7.6 112 5.1
 RAS only 64 5.4 46 5.0 38 41.3 148 6.7
 Injection only 23 1.9 28 3.0 0 0.0 51 2.3
 ACT only 180 15.1 85 9.2 15 16.3 280 12.7
 RAS + injection 64 5.4 118 12.7 0 0.0 182 8.2
 RAS + ACT 212 17.8 129 13.9 32 34.8 373 16.9
 Injection + ACT 104 8.7 104 11.2 0 0.0 208 9.4
 RAS + injection + ACT 483 40.5 374 40.3 0 0.0 857 38.8
Received ACT 979 82.1 692 74.6 47 51.1 1718 77.7
Dead at follow-up 9 0.8 1 0.1 4 4.3 14 0.6
OR 95% CI OR 95% CI OR 95% CI
Received ACT Ref. 0.64 0.51–0.79 0.21 0.14–0.34
Dead at follow-up Ref. 0.14 0.02–1.12 5.97 1.80–19.78

* By any provider along the treatment-seeking pathway

§ CHWs, PHCs, private clinics, or drug shops

ACT = artemisinin-based combination therapy, CHW = community health worker, PHC = primary health centre, RAS = rectal artesunate, RHF = referral health facility