Table 3.
Barriers to and Facilitators of Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs as Perceived by Participants Using the Systems Engineering Initiative for Patient Safety Framework
Barrier | Facilitator | |
---|---|---|
Organization | Lack of formal leadership support | Hospital accreditation |
Lack of a designated ASP leader | Designated ASP leader | |
Lack of dedicated time for ASP | Regular meetings to discuss AS related topics | |
Lack of specific ASP goals | Close collaboration with Microbiology | |
Inadequate pharmacy and microbiology staffing | Type of hospital (size, type of administration) | |
Excessive workload | External audits with feedback | |
Compensation model/suboptimal salaries | Hospital leadership engages in AS activities (hospital director is member of AS committee, supports discussion around antibiotic practice changes) | |
Frequent staff turnover | ||
Hierarchical relationships | ||
Limited understanding by hospital leaders of relevance/role of ASP | ||
Limited hospital budgets | ||
Work climate | ||
Individuals | Low adherence to guidelines | Multidisciplinary work |
Nonevidence-based antibiotic practices | Time in the job | |
Limited role of pharmacists in clinical decision-making | Empowering pharmacists (participation in rounds, | |
Limited awareness of local antimicrobial resistance data | ||
Limited adoption of AS principles | ||
Fear of loss of prescriber autonomy | ||
Hierarchical relationships | ||
Tasks | Inefficient processes for approval of restricted antimicrobials (too cumbersome, frontline providers find loopholes) | Integrating frontline providers in AS activities |
Microbiology laboratory has limited hours | Build ASP within infection prevention and control program | |
Inefficiency in communication of microbiology results | Daily rounds | |
Lack of integration with infection prevention and microbiology | ||
Inability to monitor antibiotic use data on a regular basis | ||
Limited role of pharmacist in antimicrobial management | ||
Limited training in quality improvement implementation | ||
Cost of medication | ||
Tools and IT | Lack of IT support | Training in quality improvement/patient safety |
Lack of computers | Training in how to change behavior | |
Lack of software for microbiology results | Electronic prescriptions | |
Limited number of treatment guidelines | Robust EMR to allow efficient tracking of antimicrobial resistance/antibiotic use data | |
Limited opportunities for AS training | Microbiology data integrated in EMR | |
Lack of electronic prescriptions | ||
Data fragmentation | ||
External environment | Lack of policies that facilitate implementation of ASP and/or promote AS | |
Limited guidance from public authorities on initiatives to improve antibiotic use, ASP implementation, etc. | ||
Coronavirus disease 2019–related exhaustion | Participation of quality improvement projects | |
Social climate | Reporting antibiotic use to public authorities | |
Economic prosperity | Benchmarking |
Abbreviations: AS, antimicrobial stewardship; ASP, antimicrobial stewardship program; EMR, electronic medical record; IT, information technology.