Skip to main content
. 2023 Jul 5;77(Suppl 1):S53–S61. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciad184

Table 3.

Barriers to and Facilitators of Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs as Perceived by Participants Using the Systems Engineering Initiative for Patient Safety Framework

Barrier Facilitator
Organization Lack of formal leadership support Hospital accreditation
Lack of a designated ASP leader Designated ASP leader
Lack of dedicated time for ASP Regular meetings to discuss AS related topics
Lack of specific ASP goals Close collaboration with Microbiology
Inadequate pharmacy and microbiology staffing Type of hospital (size, type of administration)
Excessive workload External audits with feedback
Compensation model/suboptimal salaries Hospital leadership engages in AS activities (hospital director is member of AS committee, supports discussion around antibiotic practice changes)
Frequent staff turnover
Hierarchical relationships
Limited understanding by hospital leaders of relevance/role of ASP
Limited hospital budgets
Work climate
Individuals Low adherence to guidelines Multidisciplinary work
Nonevidence-based antibiotic practices Time in the job
Limited role of pharmacists in clinical decision-making Empowering pharmacists (participation in rounds,
Limited awareness of local antimicrobial resistance data
Limited adoption of AS principles
Fear of loss of prescriber autonomy
Hierarchical relationships
Tasks Inefficient processes for approval of restricted antimicrobials (too cumbersome, frontline providers find loopholes) Integrating frontline providers in AS activities
Microbiology laboratory has limited hours Build ASP within infection prevention and control program
Inefficiency in communication of microbiology results Daily rounds
Lack of integration with infection prevention and microbiology
Inability to monitor antibiotic use data on a regular basis
Limited role of pharmacist in antimicrobial management
Limited training in quality improvement implementation
Cost of medication
Tools and IT Lack of IT support Training in quality improvement/patient safety
Lack of computers Training in how to change behavior
Lack of software for microbiology results Electronic prescriptions
Limited number of treatment guidelines Robust EMR to allow efficient tracking of antimicrobial resistance/antibiotic use data
Limited opportunities for AS training Microbiology data integrated in EMR
Lack of electronic prescriptions
Data fragmentation
External environment Lack of policies that facilitate implementation of ASP and/or promote AS
Limited guidance from public authorities on initiatives to improve antibiotic use, ASP implementation, etc.
Coronavirus disease 2019–related exhaustion Participation of quality improvement projects
Social climate Reporting antibiotic use to public authorities
Economic prosperity Benchmarking

Abbreviations: AS, antimicrobial stewardship; ASP, antimicrobial stewardship program; EMR, electronic medical record; IT, information technology.