Skip to main content
. 2023 Jun 21;11:1163698. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1163698

Table 1.

Summary of results from best fit models for Tokyo, Aichi, and Osaka, 2020–2022.

Covariate Estimate 95% Confidence Interval
Lower Upper
Tokyo Intercept −8.676 −12.089 −5.21
log(NP with 8-day-lag) 0.692 0.427 0.955
Daily change of log(NP with 8-day-lag) −2.527 −3.345 −1.713
First order autoregression coefficient 0.968 0.95 0.986
Aichi Intercept −20.165 −27.325 −13.172
log(Night Population with 9-day-lag) 1.61 1.067 2.168
First order autoregression coefficient 0.959 0.938 0.979
Osaka Intercept −17.167 −28.262 −8.663
log(NP with 8-day-lag) 1.254 0.638 2.044
Daily change of log(NP with 8-day-lag) −3.398 −4.92 −1.843
First order autoregression coefficient 0.976 0.949 0.997

For Tokyo and Osaka, models with 8-day-lagged night population as well as its daily change were the best fit model, whereas the best fit model for Aichi does not include daily change in night-time population. The estimates for intercept, coefficients of explanatory variables, and the first-order autocorrelation coefficients are shown with 95% confidence intervals.