Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Jul 6.
Published before final editing as: J Chem Theory Comput. 2023 Jan 6:10.1021/acs.jctc.2c01024. doi: 10.1021/acs.jctc.2c01024

Table 3.

The test performance on the FreeSolv-PHYSPROP dataset. Each model is trained on 50 random splits and the mean and standard deviation are reported. sPhysNet-MT-ens5 is a deep ensemble of five sPhysNet-MT models. The errors in hydration free energies are reported in kcal/mol and the errors in logP are reported in log unit.

Ref. Model Target
Hydration (FreeSolv) logP (PHYSPROP)
MAE RMSE MAE RMSE
sPhysNet-MT 0.392±0.064 0.663±0.135 0.262±0.006 0.421±0.017
sPhysNet-MT-ens5 0.359±0.063 0.620±0.140 0.242±0.004 0.393±0.012
Previous hydration free energy prediction models
36 SVM --- 0.852±0.171 --- ---
XGBoost --- 1.025±0.185 --- ---
RF --- 1.143±0.230 --- ---
DNN --- 1.013±0.197 --- ---
GCN --- 1.149±0.262 --- ---
GAT --- 1.304±0.272 --- ---
MPNN --- 1.327±0.279 --- ---
Attentive FP --- 1.091±0.191 --- ---
40 3DGCN 0.575±0.053 0.824±0.140 --- ---
42 AGBT 0.594±0.090 0.994±0.217 --- ---
39 D-MPNN --- 0.998±0.207 --- ---
37, 68 weave --- 1.220±0.280 --- ---
43 A3D-PNAConv 0.417±0.066 0.719±0.168 --- ---
69 FML 0.570 --- --- ---
Previous logP prediction models
70 QSPR --- --- --- 0.78
60 GraphCNN --- --- --- 0.56
71 DNNtaut --- --- --- 0.47±0.02
DNNmono --- --- --- 0.50±0.02
72 OPERA --- --- --- 0.78