Skip to main content
. 2023 Jun 22;10:1180769. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1180769

Table 7.

Diagnostic performance of the QF-Ag or QF-Mg and TTV load analyzed in combination at M1 for prediction of CMV reactivation in R+ KTR.

Cut-off (QF-CMV: IU/ml, TTV: log10 copies/ml) Time point Follow-up Sensitivity* % [95% CI] Specificity* % [95% CI] PPV* % [95% CI] NPV* % [95% CI]
QF-Ag < 0.2 and TTV ≥ 3.45 M1 M1–M4 25.0 [3.2; 65.0] 85.7 [72.8; 94.1] 22.2 [2.8; 60.0] 87.5 [74.7; 95.3]
M1 M1–M6 27.3 [6.0; 61.0] 87.0 [73.7; 95.1] 33.3 [7.5; 70.1] 83.3 [70.0; 92.5]
M1 M1–M12 28.6 [8.4; 58.1] 88.4 [74.9; 96.1] 44.4 [13.7; 78.8] 79.2 [65.0; 89.5]
QF-Mg < 0.5 and TTV ≥ 3.45 M1 M1–M4 37.5 [8.5; 75.5] 89.8 [77.8; 96.6] 37.5 [8.5; 75.5] 89.8 [77.8; 96.6]
M1 M1–M6 36.4 [10.9; 69.2] 91.3 [79.2; 97.6] 50.0 [15.7; 84.3] 91.3 [72.8; 94.1]
M1 M1–M12 35.7 [12.8; 64.9] 93.0 [80.9; 98.5] 62.5 [24.5; 91.5] 81.6 [68.0; 91.2]

The diagnostic accuracy of the combination of markers was assessed using QF-CMV manufacturer’s cut-offs and the previously determined TTV cut-offs. PPV, positive predictive value; NPV, negative predictive value; and CI, confidence interval.

*

Calculated in patients with data available over the study period.