Skip to main content
. 2023 Jun 22;10:1180769. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1180769

Table 8.

Diagnostic performance of the QF-Ag or QF-Mg and TTV load analyzed in combination at M1 for prediction of CMV reactivation in R+ KTR.

Cut-off (QF-CMV: IU/ml,TTV: log10 copies/ml) Time point Follow-up Sensitivity* % [95% CI] Specificity* % [95% CI] PPV* % [95% CI] NPV* % [95% CI]
QF-Ag < 2.23 and TTV ≥ 4.27 M1 M1–M4 50.0 [15.7; 84.3] 79.6 [65.7; 89.8] 28.6 [8.4; 58.1] 90.7 [77.9; 97.4]
QF-Ag < 9.12 and TTV ≥ 4.27 M1 M1–M6 63.6 [30.8; 89.1] 69.6 [54.2; 82.3] 33.3 [14.6; 57.0] 88.9 [73.9; 97.0]
QF-Ag ≤ 2.48 and TTV  > 4.23 M1 M1–M12 64.3 [35.1; 87.2] 86.0 [72.1; 94.7] 60.0 [32.3; 83.7] 88.1 [74.4; 96.0]
QF-Mg < 1.29 and TTV ≥ 4.27 M1 M1–M4 37.5 [8.5; 75.5] 87.8 [75.2; 95.4] 33.3 [7.5; 70.1] 89.6 [77.3; 96.5]
QF-Mg < 1.29 and TTV ≥ 4.27 M1 M1–M6 45.4 [16.8; 76.6] 91.3 [79.2; 98.6] 55.6 [21.2; 86.3] 87.5 [74.7; 95.3]
QF-Mg ≤ 1.27 and TTV  > 4.23 M1 M1–M12 42.9 [17.7; 71.1] 93.0 [80.9; 98.5] 66.7 [29.9; 92.5] 83.3 [70.0; 92.5]

The diagnostic accuracy of the combination of markers was assessed using the optimal QF-CMV and TTV cut-offs determined by ROC curves. Abbreviations: AUC, Area under the ROC Curve; PPV, positive predictive value; NPV, negative predictive value; and CI, confidence interval.

*

Calculated in patients with data available over the study period.