Skip to main content
. 2023 Apr 25;15(6):2984–2996. doi: 10.21037/jtd-22-1798

Table 2. Diagnostic imaging obtained at OSH and at our institution after transfer.

Diagnostic imaging Percent of total patients in category (n=65) Percent with esophageal perforation P value
Esophagram at OSH 0.46
   Not obtained 78.5% [51] 60.8% [31]
   Obtained 21.5% [14] 71.4% [10]
Esophagram findings at OSH 0.90
   Contained perforation 15.4% [10] 70.0% [7]
   Uncontained perforation 6.2% [4] 75.0% [3]
   Not obtained 78.5% [51] 60.8% [31]
CT findings at OSH 0.03
   Contained perforation 24.6% [16] 75.0% [12]
   Uncontained perforation 20.0% [13] 76.9% [10]
   Pneumomediastinum 46.2% [30] 56.7% [17]
   Not obtained 3.1% [2] 100.0% [2]
   No evidence of perforation 6.2% [4] 0.0% [0]
Pleural effusion at OSH <0.01
   Yes 36.9% [24] 83.3% [20]
   No 60.0% [39] 48.7% [19]
   Unknown 3.1% [2] 100.0% [2]
Esophagram findings at UCH <0.01
   Contained perforation 13.8% [9] 100.0% [9]
   Uncontained perforation 10.8% [7] 100.0% [7]
   No evidence of perforation 30.8% [20] 5.0% [1]
   Not obtained 44.6% [29] 82.8% [24]
CT findings at UCH 0.36
   Contained perforation 6.2% [4] 75.0% [3]
   Uncontained perforation 1.5% [1] 100.0% [1]
   No evidence of perforation 6.2% [4] 25.0% [1]
   Not obtained 86.2% [56] 64.3% [36]

Data are presented as % [n]. CT, computed tomography; OSH, outside hospital; UCH, University of Colorado Hospital.