Table 1.
Data collection methods, investigators and participant categories.
| SL | Data source | Data collection technique | Participant type(s) | Data collector(s) | Rationale |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Research | In-depth interview (IDI) | Young and adolescent MSM and self-identified gay men | Anthropologists, sociologist, public health experts | To elicit an in-depth understanding of the underlying contexts, socio-sexual dynamics and effects of drug intake on their sexual activities. |
| 2 | Focus group discussions (FGDs) | To provide a breadth of understanding of the normative and societal perspectives regarding chemsex among this group. | |||
| 3 | Pilot interventions (same strategies were used for both of the interventions) | Informal discussions | Young and adolescent MSM and self-identified gay men | Psychologists, clinical psychologists, and data collector from the target population | To explore and understand the socio-sexual and cultural dynamics of chemsex, drug use patterns, sexual behaviors and their service needs |
| 4 | Service providers of DICs (i.e., DIC managers, peer educators, medical assistant) | Psychologists, clinical psychologists, counselors, physicians, anthropologists | To understand and explore the reasons and implications for partaking in chemsex on a broader community level | ||
| 5 | Service register | Quantitative information | Counselors and physicians belonging to the pilot project | To understand the number of participants who have engaged in chemsex | |
| 6 | Field diaries (Qualitative) | Counselors and physicians belonging to the pilot project | To understand the common socio-sexual scenarios leading to chemsex, drug use patterns, and sexual behaviors | ||
| 7 | Programmatic monitoring and evaluation visits | Young and adolescent MSM and self-identified gay men | Physicians, counselors and programmatic experts (e.g., sociologists, anthropologists, demographers, etc.) | To understand the service needs and uptake, as well as the overall dynamics of chemsex |