Skip to main content
. 2023 Jun 27;30(3):42–59. doi: 10.21315/mjms2023.30.3.4

Table 1.

Study characteristics

Authors, year Country Design Participants characteristics/Sample size Setting Trainer Methodological quality
Mohammadzadeh et al., 2019 (29) Malaysia RCT 271 male and female adolescents (13 years old– 18 years old) Orphanages Researcher High (85%)
Lee et al., 2020 (38) Taiwan RCT 2,522 students with age 10-year-old to 12-year-old School Teacher Moderate (62%)
Jamali et al., 2016 (39) Iran Experimental (pre-post-tests) and control group 100 students, aged 13 years old –14 years old School Qualified trainers Moderate (69%)
Yankey and Urmi, 2012 (42) India A quasi-experimental study 600 Tibetan adolescents aged 13 years old– 19 years old School Researcher High (100%)
McMullen and McMullen, 2018 (44) Uganda Experimental study (pre-post-tests) and control group 620 students aged 13 years old –18 years old at the baseline and 170 students at post-intervention ‘at 1 year’ were participated School Teachers High (88%)
Roy et al., 2016 (43) India Intervention study (pre-post-follow up) 42 adolescent boys, mean age (SD) 14.38 (1.05) years old School Researcher Moderate (66%)
Ndetei et al., 2019 (45) Kenya Intervention (pre-post-follow up) 2,273 students at baseline, and only 1,075 complete the questionnaire for 9 months. Age from 11 years old to 18 years old School Trained teachers Moderate (77%)
Mohammadi and Poursaberi, 2018 (40) Iran A quasi-experimental study 120 Iranian adolescent cancer patients, aged 9 years old–18 years old Hospital Clinical psychologist Moderate (77%)
Eslami et al., 2016 (41) Iran A quasi-experimental study 126 female students, the mean age group was 16 years old School Researcher High (100%)
McMahon and Stephanie, 2020 (46) Australia Experimental (pre-post-tests) and control group 40 students aged from 16 years old to 17 years old School Teacher High (88%)