Skip to main content
. 2023 Jul 6;13:10971. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-38169-8

Table 2.

Characteristics of the included studies.

Author, year
(Country)
Design Risk of bias Participants
(Number, female ratio)
Mean age of participants Measures Intervention
(Type, duration, mode, comparison)
Follow-up (f/u) time points

Ahn (2017)37

(Korea)

Quasi-experimental Moderate

E = 15, C = 15

100%

N/A MBI

Type: mindfulness-based stress reduction program

Duration: 5 weeks

Mode: face to face, group

Comparison: waitlist

Pre, post

Alenezi et al. (2019)38

(Saudi)

Quasi-experimental Moderate

E = 154, C = 142

N/A

N/A MBI

Type: burnout prevention workshop

Duration: 2 days

Mode: face to face, group

Comparison: no information about intervention

Pre, f/u (1, 3, 6 months)

Alexander et al. (2015)27

(USA)

RCT Some concerns

E = 20, C = 20

97.5%

46.4 MBI

Type: yoga

Duration: 8 weeks

Mode: face to face, group

Comparison: usual care

Pre, post

Bae et al. (2019)39

(Korea)

Quasi-experimental Moderate

E = 17, C = 17

91.2%

31.7 MBI

Type: mindfulness-based stress reduction program

Duration: 4 weeks

Mode: face to face, group

Comparison: waitlist

Pre, post, f/u (4 weeks)

Bagheri et al. (2019)25

(Iran)

Quasi-experimental No Information

E = 30, C = 30

88.1%

33.2 MBI

Type: stress-coping & cognitive behavioral therapy

Duration: 10 weeks

Mode: face to face, group

Comparison: no information about intervention

Pre, post, f/u (1 month)

Berger et al. (2011)28

(Israel)

RCT Some concerns

E = 42, C = 38

100%

E = 49.3 C = 47.7 ProQoL

Type: reducing secondary traumatization

Duration: 12 weeks

Mode: face to face, group

Comparison: waitlist

Pre, post

Choi et al. (2016)40

(Korea)

Quasi-experimental Moderate

E = 34, C = 15

N/A

E = 24.0 C = 25.4 Pines, Aronson, Kafry (1981)

Type: empowerment program

Duration: 2 days

Mode: face to face, group

Comparison: waitlist

Pre, post

Dincer et al. (2021)21

(Turkey)

RCT Some concerns

E = 35, 91.4%

C = 37, 86.5%

E = 33.5 C = 33.4 Pines & Aronson (1988)

Type: emotional freedom techniques

Duration: 20 min

Mode: face to face, group

Comparison: waitlist

Pre, post

Duarte et al. (2016)41

(Portugal)

Quasi-experimental High

E = 29, 89.6%

C = 19, 84.2%

E = 38.9 C = 42.1 ProQoL

Type: mindfulness-based stress reduction program

Duration: 6 weeks

Mode: face to face, group

Comparison: waitlist

Pre, post

Felker. (2013)42

(USA)

Quasi-experimental Moderate

E = 17, C = 17

94.1%

40.3 MBI

Type: yoga

Duration: 6 weeks

Mode: face to face, group

Comparison: waitlist

Pre, post

Jang (2019)43

(Korea)

Quasi-experimental Moderate

E = 24, 75.0%

C = 24, 87.5%

E = 26.1 C = 25.8 MBI

Type: workplace mutual respect program

Duration: 4 months

Mode: face to face, group

Comparison: no information about intervention

Pre, post

Jang et al. (2015)26

(Korea)

Quasi-experimental Moderate

E = 14, C = 15

100%

N/A MBI

Type: group art therapy

Duration: 8 weeks

Mode: face to face, group

Comparison: no information about intervention

Pre, post, f/u (4 weeks)

Kang et al. (2017)44

(Korea)

Quasi-experimental Moderate

E = 15, C = 23

N/A

E = 27.9 C = 26.6 ProQoL

Type: self-reflection program

Duration: 6 weeks

Mode: face to face, group

Comparison: no information about intervention

Pre, post
Kharatzadeh et al. (2020)29 (Iran) RCT Some concerns

E = 26, 92.3%

C = 27, 88.8%

E = 41.0 C = 39.2 ProQoL

Type: emotional regulation training

Duration: six 2-h sessions

Mode: N/A

Comparison: waitlist

Pre, post

Kil et al. (2016)30

(Korea)

RCT Some concerns

E = 26, C = 30

100%

N/A MBI

Type: self-cosmetology training program

Duration: 3 weeks

Mode: face to face, group

Comparison: no information about intervention

Pre, post

Kim et al. (2016)45

(Korea)

Quasi-experimental Moderate

E = 14, C = 18

71.9%

26.9 ProQoL

Type: overcoming compassion fatigue program

Duration: 5 weeks

Mode: face to face, group

Comparison: waitlist

Pre, post

Kim et al. (2018)22

(Korea)

Quasi-experimental Moderate

E = 23, 100%

C = 24, 91.7%

N/A OLBI

Type: group rational emotive behavior therapy program with group counseling

Duration: 8 weeks

Mode: face to face, group

Comparison: no information about intervention

Pre, post, f/u (4 weeks)

Kubota et al. (2016)31

(Japan)

RCT Some concerns

E = 50, 96.0%

C = 46, 96.0%

E = 38.9 C = 40.0 MBI

Type: psycho-oncology training program

Duration: 16 h (2 days)

Mode: face to face, group

Comparison: waitlist

Pre, f/u (3 months)

Lee et al. (2017)46

(Korea)

Quasi-experimental Moderate

E = 18, C = 18

N/A

30.6 MBI

Type: violence coping program

Duration: 4 weeks

Mode: face to face, group

Comparison: waitlist

Pre, post, f/u (4 weeks)

Luo et al. (2019)47

(China)

Quasi-experimental High

E = 41, C = 46

97.7%

28.1 MBI

Type: record 3 good things

Duration: 4 weeks

Mode: mobile application

Comparison: no information about intervention

Pre, post

Özbaş et al. (2016)32

(Turkey)

RCT Some concerns

E = 38, C = 44

N/A

N/A MBI

Type: psychodrama-based psychological empowerment program

Duration: 10 weeks

Mode: face to face, group

Comparison: waitlist

Pre, f/u (1 month after intervention), f/u (3 month after intervention)

Rajeswari et al. (2020)23

(India)

RCT Some concerns

E = 60, C = 60

80.0%

N/A ProQoL

Type: accelerated recovery program

Duration: 5 weeks

Mode: N/A

Comparison: routine activity

Pre, post, f/u (3, 6, 9, 12 months)

Redhead et al. (2011)33

(England)

RCT Some concerns

E = 12, 83.0%

C = 9, 78.0%

E = 39.4 C = 42.6 MBI

Type: psychosocial intervention training

Duration: 8 months

Mode: face to face, group

Comparison: waitlist

Pre, post

Rhee et al. (2012)48

(Korea)

Quasi-experimental Moderate

E = 13, C = 15

100%

E = 43.8 C = 41.5 MBI

Type: mindfulness-based stress reduction program

Duration: 4 weeks

Mode: face to face, group

Comparison: no information about intervention

Pre, post
Sabancıogullari et al. (2015)49 (Turkey) Quasi-experimental Moderate

E = 33, 97.2%

C = 30, 93.3%

E = 27.5 C = 29.6 MBI

Type: professional identity awareness development education program

Duration: 10 weeks

Mode: face to face, group

Comparison: no information about intervention

Pre, post, f/u (6 months)

Shin et al. (2020)34

(Korea)

RCT Some concerns

E = 25, C = 25

100%

E = 26.4 C = 26.6 ProQoL

Type: Patchouli oil inhalation

Duration: 24 h

Mode: N/A

Comparison: pure sweet almond oil inhalation

Pre, post

Wei et al. (2017)35

(China)

RCT Some concerns

E = 51, C = 51

86.0%

N/A MBI

Type: active intervention and regular management

Duration: 6 months

Mode: N/A

Comparison: regular management

Pre, post

Xie et al. (2020)36

(China)

RCT Some concerns

E = 53, C = 53

100.0%

27.7 MBI

Type: mindfulness

Duration: 8 weeks

Mode: face to face, group

Comparison: education

Pre, post, f/u (1, 3 months)

Yoo (2017)50

(Korea)

Quasi-experimental Moderate

E = 21, 90.5%

C = 27, 96.3%

E = 26.1 C = 26.5 ProQoL

Type: expressive writing program

Duration: 5 weeks

Mode: non-face-to-face, individual

Comparison: no information about intervention

Pre, post

Yoon (2013)51

(Korea)

Quasi-experimental Moderate

E = 25, C = 25

N/A

N/A MBI

Type: happy arts therapy

Duration: 4 weeks

Mode: face to face, group

Comparison: no information about intervention

Pre, post

C comparison group, E experimental group, MBI Maslach Burnout Inventory scale, OLBI Oldenburg Burnout Inventory, ProQoL Professional Quality of Life Scale, RCT Randomized controlled trial, N/A not available.