Skip to main content
. 2023 Jun 22;14:1203506. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1203506

Table 4.

Correlation of autoantibody reactivity against PAD2- and PAD4-citrullinated C1-INH with clinical features.

Clinical feature ACPA reactivity against
PAD2-citrullinated C1-INH
ACPA reactivity against
PAD4-citrullinated C1-INH
Correlation coefficient rs p-Value Correlation coefficient rs p-Value
Age −0.1053 0.2946 0.1755 0.0792
Sex 0.1851 0.9931
Disease duration −0.0789 0.4332 0.3383 0.0005
Smoking 0.1509 0.5094
ACPA status 0.0036 <0.0001
RF status 0.3621 0.0022
CRP at sampling 0.2920 0.0034 0.1648 0.1031
ESR at sampling 0.2597 0.0094 0.1670 0.0984
DAS28 0.1588 0.1165 0.2743 0.006
HAQ 0.0757 0.4543 0.1692 0.0924
Cortisone treatment 0.9918 0.4793

For correlations with continuous variables, Spearman’s rank-order correlation test was used, and Spearman’s correlation coefficient rs and the p-values are listed. For associations with categorical variables, Mann–Whitney U and Kruskal–Wallis rank-sum tests were used, and the p-values are listed. Significant p-values (p < 0.05) and corresponding correlation coefficients are highlighted in bold. ACPA, anti-citrullinated protein antibody; RF, rheumatoid factor; CRP, C-reactive protein; ESR, erythrocyte sedimentation rate; HAQ, health assessment questionnaire.